this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2025
1265 points (99.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

8431 readers
3283 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 65 points 11 hours ago (9 children)

Shout out to Castlevania II, where you can hold anywhere from 0 to 256 laurels. Yes, you read that right -- 256, not 255. I inspected RAM to double check. It's a 16-bit word on an 8-bit system with a maximum value of 0x100. They could have used 8 bits instead of 16. But no, they really did choose this arbitrary number.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 hours ago

That's a super old article as well.

They got rightfully roasted in the comments for not knowing even the most basic things about computing.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

Still odd, I very much doubt they use a 8bit variable to set this limit. What would this bring ?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 11 hours ago

Still odd

Actually, it's even.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 120 points 13 hours ago (12 children)

Numbers guy here, I can confirm 256 is an evenly specific number, and not an oddly specific number.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 12 hours ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

What's app starting from 1 the scrubs

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago

Like memory in bits maybe, so 64 128 256 512 1024 2028

[–] [email protected] 8 points 14 hours ago

Since people are binary like the great Orange says, they have to use a power of 2?

[–] [email protected] 48 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Yep very weird, should have been 255.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 14 hours ago (8 children)

No, you can't have a group of zero, so the counter doesn't need to waste a position counting zero.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 hours ago

Sure you can. It's a group that exists, but it has 0 participants.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

0 is reserved for the FBI agent listening in.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Nah, ICE agents don't care about evidence.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 hours ago

Also they can't use computers anyway. They just publicly post on social media. It's considered secure because no one likes them enough to follow them.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 14 hours ago

You probably could, if everyone got banned or something

[–] [email protected] 11 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

If you ever create a system where the number of users is "group.members - 1" everywhere in the code, I'd be very disappointed in you and deny that PR.

On another note; I doubt WhatsApp are so concerned with performance they are actually limiting the number of group members by the data type.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

But it wouldn't be like that though would it. It would be public group.members() and the u8 would be private.

If all the millions of groups are saved on a central database then making the size a u8 isn't really that weird

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›