this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2025
171 points (96.2% liked)

politics

24693 readers
2595 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Elon Musk declared on X the formation of a new political party amid his ongoing feud with President Donald Trump over the "Big Beautiful Bill."

"Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom," Musk wrote in an X post on Saturday.

The Tesla CEO had said Friday on his social media platform that one way the new party could work is to focus on winning just a handful of Senate seats and House districts that could serve as the "deciding vote" on "contentious laws," given the "razor-thin legislative margins" in Congress.

In response, Trump said on his Truth Social platform on Sunday that Musk had gone "completely off the rails."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Get them equally strong and face them at each other.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

I really want to know what my parents think about this. Because they fucking LOVE Elon Musk and voted Trump because of him.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

Does he call it the "National Super Dope American Party"?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

The only explanation for this is that Trump basically milked Musk's popularity with dumb people and kept him around until Musk was no longer useful. Musk on the other hand thought he was going to control Trump to be a shadow president on his crazy drug-induced power trip but got a reality check and now his ego is hurt and is making a fuss. I doubt this will gain any traction, to build a political party is extremely expensive, Reps and Dems have hundreds of rich people behind them for greasing the wheels, plus brand recognizability and organized people and community presence. The most we can tell from this is that billionaires still need a political front to push their agenda and see how many times can Musk fail without losing his fortune.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I really hate the term 'freedom' now. It's thrown around so much and it means basically nothing anymore. "Join this! Now with 20% more freedom!". Freedom to/from what? It's never stated, it's just a vibe.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

It's been like that for decades now, going back at least to George W. Bush saying that Al Qaeda "hates us for our freedoms".

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

Just make some fucking basic ass product, call it freedom or patriot and overcharge for it. Boom profit.

Like this dipshit.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

I have entertained the idea that Musk hacked the vote tabulations. If it's true, Trump would lose his mind knowing his one and only richman was hacking for someone else now.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago

Techno feudal fascism vs Steongman fascism.

let_them_fight.gif

[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 days ago

To be honest, they both got off the rails long, long ago.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

None of the Secret Service are true patriots.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Someone's gotta do it eventually. Maybe some radicalized Tesla or SpaceX employee.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

All aboard the crazy train, we're going of the rails.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 days ago (2 children)

He's not wrong, there are people disillusioned with both parties. But if Elon thinks we're all idiots, and will flock to other nazi party, I've got a bridge to sell him.

Maybe some of the center right, and magas who've been personally wronged by the Trumpsters will swing that way, but he's gonna find the left isn't quite as stupid as he thinks.

Split the vote ding dong, go on, do it. I dare you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

If someone else had started a third party, it might have pulled support from both parties. But, I think there aren't many democrats who will join his party after he did so much to get Trump elected, then worked for his government for a while.

I hope he throws billions at this project, because IMO the only thing it might do is fracture the GOP base.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

but he's gonna find the left isn't quite as stupid as he thinks.

I wish I shared your optimism. Nothing in my experience of life tells me that betting on the left, especially their elected representatives, to not do something stupid is a good plan.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

By "left" I'm assuming you mean liberals. "The left" doesn't really have elected politicians. Unless you count Mamdani and he's not even fully elected yet.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Liberals are what passes for the left here, yes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

Leftists are socialists, the left is relative. I don't understand why this is so hard for people to get.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The right finally gets a Jill Stein. Good luck with that.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I mean in fairness, they've always had Jill Steins. We can bitch about the spoiler effect and yell at our guys for voting, but election after election when you look at people focusing the blame on the greens when we lose, liberterians and other right wing parties, always have more votes than left wing 3rd parties.

Also sadly it sounds like musk is actually planning to do the strategic right way to do a new party. IE focus on house and senate seats to basically to threaten narrow votes.

In short it sounds more like he's making the republican's "Manchins".

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

Even senate and house seats are a big step. The best way would be your local state senate, house, and mayoral positions. This is the best way to build a grassroots movement and get more people on your side.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If it de-thrones Trump, it can't be all that bad

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Well doesn't sound like it's going presidential, and currently I don't think if trump goes for a 3rd term, it will involve elections.

I mean, we don't have high regard for the guy that killed hitler.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Hitler wasn't completely bad. He did manage to kill Hitler. So..you know... He's got that going for him.

load more comments
view more: next ›