this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
442 points (99.3% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2900 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Can they just release the report? Why is this guy still walking around free?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

I have a suspicion the House is holding it over his head to keep him from swearing in for the next congressional session. He won his election this year, so he could just simply re-jiin the House even though he resigned for this term.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

He can pull out now. But he may have already come a little

too close to getting the job. Might have blown it.

The house could birth an investigation that spawns many problems.

Shouldn't have been so childish.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Tobias, you blow hard!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

I appreciate the effort.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

i wonder if he’s going to transition into being another annoying right wing pundit. he was always more of a talker than a doer in the house, and i can’t imagine him going back there because of the pending ethics report. maybe he’ll take pete hegseths place on fox news

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Hopefully DeSantis doesn’t pick him to replace Marco Rubio's senate seat

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

If that happens, then they should release the report. At a bare minimum, he should never hold public office again.

[–] [email protected] 60 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Resigning from the 119th congress is essentially an admission of guilt at this point. Whatever is in that report will most likely remain sealed as long as he has the cover of being a private citizen once again, which is why he turned these two opportunities down - to keep the evidence of his wrongdoing under wraps so he can't be held accountable by either the public or the justice department.

So, Matt Gaetz is a pedophile and a child molester. And knowing the state of our shitty fucking country he's probably going to get away with it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

And trafficker. I thought the qanon wanted to "save the children"?

Or is this just IOKIYAR?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

as long as he has the cover of being a private citizen

Man, if you get elected into ANY government office you shouldn't be able to be considered a private citizen.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

I mean, #metoo took forever to come around. I like to think in some future he'll get boned

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

I'm hoping against everything else that Johnson will stop protecting him because he's now not worth anything to them now and isn't worth the political capital to protect 🤞

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

Huh. I would have thought they left him in, even if it was as a lightning rod to attract attention while the other nominees all got through.

Must have been he didn't want to be questioned too much.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Weird. Either there's a 4D chess move here, or Trump doesn't have full control of the GOP like he wants.

That's going to cause problems.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Or Trump just named somebody he knew would have no chance and make the Left waste energy opposing him, so that they're more accepting of whomever he names for real.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Ugh. I know I'm more accepting. And disgusted by it :(

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 days ago

Or Gaetz is hoping that no further details from the ethics report leak, and he can salvage his career after this blows over. If it ever does that is.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Or it's going to prevent some of the problems...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Problems for Trump.

Not problems for a lame duck

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

It's the second. Gaetz was way too inflammatory for the lesser evil tactic.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

I don't think the GOP was honestly expecting him to win.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Alright Marjorie Trailer-Queen, time to nut up (🤮 sorry) and leak (it keeps getting worse) that incriminating info about your fellow GOPedo colleagues that you were so brazen about earlier

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

She got a hush appointment so she won't be talking about ethics reports anymore.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago

She never had any intention of releasing anything. She was trying to keep the Gaetz report from coming out.

load more comments
view more: next ›