this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2025
563 points (97.2% liked)

Showerthoughts

35769 readers
2435 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ok so how does a cancer kill its host?

It grows until it consumes so many nutrients that the other living cells don't get enough. The host literally starves even if he eats plentifully.

The same applies for the US: The billionaires are not only hoarding wealth, but by doing so they're crippling the economy for workers and everybody besides themselves.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

This was pretty much the point Agent Smith was making to Morpheus in his ‘virus’ speech.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Literal parasites who consume everything and offer nothing in return

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 hours ago

I think what you mean to say is capitalism is cancer. There are books written on the subject.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 hours ago

Every person who kills a billionaire does so in self defense.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago

jokes on them cancer dies with the host

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 hours ago

Corporations with more than 1 billion are more of a cancer than individual billionaires

[–] [email protected] 21 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

The (original) Nazis are rightfully considered monsters for killing millions of people in the 20th century. What will any survivors of the incineration of earth consider the billionaires that are killing BILLIONS of us for greed?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago

never, next question

[–] [email protected] 29 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Figuratively, but yes, I agree.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 hours ago

actually yes, figuratively is the word that i should have used.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Billionaires are a symptom, not the cancer itself.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 hours ago

you forgot what ties together your thought: they are destroying the planet.

they are literally killing the host.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago

You know in hungarian we would flip this a bit on its head as we have a curse, "a rák vigye el", which means may cancer "bring them away"(kill them). I support this idea in this specific case.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 10 hours ago

Lemmy circle jerk moment

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

You're right about the similarities, but having similarities is not what "literally" means. That word is so fucking overused.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 hours ago

Not a fan fat shaming that gets bundled in with that but basically. It's the vice of greed, plain and simple.

Like imagine rolling up to a potluck and just buying the table, leaving naught but a bag of chips for the rest of the party. Even if you can afford it, it's still a crime against your fellows.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 hours ago

Better prep the patient for surgery

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

Why can't each person. Rubbing for office get a fixed Amount of money to spend on their campaign. Make it all level playing field. Yes I said rubbing.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 hours ago

I've been rubbing for office for years and I've nothing to show for it but chaffing.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 hours ago

then we all should sign up and unlock UBI

[–] [email protected] 79 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

At this point radical measures are necessary to right the wrongs committed by the rich. Taxes are a good start but not enough.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago

Overnight massive protests at their places of residence will help

[–] [email protected] 44 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

Jail sentences,

countless are dead due to billionaire greed. they are directly responsible.

life sentences for billionaires

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Jail them and spend even more money? Naa, just eat em

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 hours ago

they rich are an ethical source of protein

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

There is no law providing for such a sentence, so what you are talking about is either "make billionaireism illegal" or "extrajudicial punishment". In the case of the former, we need a Guillotine Party to take over the DNC much like the Tea Party took over the GOP. Or, we need a guillotine party, French Revolution style, to resolve the problem-class at its source.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

If I have a company, where I intentionally make choices that kill my costumers, that would make me liable for manslaughter, me and anyone involved in the deaths. why healthcare billionaires are not liable?

same with every other billionaire who profits from human suffering and deaths.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

No, actually, it doesn't make you liable for manslaughter. It probably doesn't even rise to the level of civil liability for wrongful death. They are compliant with the law, and they make sure of that by having their lawyers write the laws. The "anyone involved in the deaths" includes the deceased themselves, who is determined to bear primary responsibility.

We can override the laws they are writing (Guillotine Party) or we can suspend the laws to hold them accountable (guillotine party). But jailing them without a conviction just isn't feasible.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

fuck the law. those laws let them off the hook because they bribed (lobby) to have those laws.

Just because a mass murder is legal does not mean it has to go unpunished.

The holocaust was 100% legal, and no one has ever complained that it is unfair to prosecute nazis for not breaking the law.

when the law is so unfair, you cannot use the law as an argument.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 hours ago

I don't think you're understanding me. I'll see if I can rephrase.

There is no "jail them for life" option without the law. If you try to imprison them without the law, the law will just come in and free them. You're suggesting a middle option that is simply not feasible.

I'm asking you to choose between:

  • "Guillotine Party", a political party, much like the Tea Party, dedicated to stripping the problem-class of their excessive political power, perhaps by creating laws to justify their permanent imprisonment. We politically, figuratively decapitate them. This approach can (theoretically) jail them for life, by creating the law that would allow it to happen.

  • "guillotine party", where we solve the problem-class in much the same way that 18th century France solved their aristocracy problem. We literally decapitate them. This approach will not jail them for life; this approach will execute them for anti-revolutionary activities.

While the specific details will vary wildly, these are the only two general options we have available to us to effect reform: politics, or force.

load more comments
view more: next ›