this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024
401 points (98.5% liked)

News

23367 readers
2624 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Elon Musk’s frequent presence at Mar-a-Lago and his involvement in sensitive conversations have raised concerns among Trump’s longstanding advisers, who view Musk as overly assertive and self-promoting.

Musk’s push for influence, including voicing policy ideas and taking credit for Trump’s win, has raised concerns about his motives and loyalty.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 129 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Trump’s longstanding advisers, who view Musk as overly assertive and self-promoting.

Sounds like "trumps longstanding advisors" are worried they did all this work to get trump in power to use him are seeing musk come in and begin to use trump instead of them.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Pretty much. His advisors have quietly expressed "concern" to the media about a lot of things, and they go nowhere.

Every once in a while, it does. Laura Loomer seems to have been forgotten. That might just be Trump getting bored with sleeping with her, though.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago

He'll have them sign something saying they were never advisors at all and he was there from the start.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 92 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Let the infighting begin! Trump hires the worst people and creates a toxic "vie for the king's attention" atmosphere.

I wonder how many mooches he'll last.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Donald "I have the record for the most people fired from a cabinet" Trump? He only hires the best people!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

And the record most cabinet convictions

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Trump hires the worst people and creates a toxic "vie for the king's attention" atmosphere.

Now thats a mutually assured destruction scenario I'd be in favor of.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Maybe we can help it along by stomaching a little tactical truth social posting

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

People don't understand, they both speak the same language. They're both natural grifters... What's more Musk is probably better at it than Trump was. Trump needed lessons from Roy Cohn, who was a ruthless, damaged, low empathy, closet homosexual and self-hater.

Musk didn't need that kind of mentor, he's a natural grifter, and my bet is that Trump is fascinated by him. They do similar things in different ways.

Only in certain scenarios would this blow up, and Musk has already bent the knee to Trump, so those scenarios are unlikely.

Musk is a friendly fellow grifter Trump can use, and has power over, which is what Trump likes.

At best we'll see Musk become a fall guy for Trump's shortcomings. But seeing as Trump may later die in office, Musk might also avoid such a fate. Only time will tell.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Based on the pictures Elon thinks he owns Trump. This is going to be fun.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Considering Trump's ego all the people would have to do is start sharing #muskownsdonald on social media for him to kick him off the ticket

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago

The billionaire cosplayer feels inadequate next to the actual billionaire

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure a little over half of the conservatives hate Musk just as much as the left does. He painted himself as a victory factor when in reality he's just a liability. Conservatives don't like the reminder that Trump got less votes this time that in 2020, and I like to say Elon is why.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Elon almost certainly earned votes for Trump by

  1. Funding a shit ton of election ads
  2. Using Twitter to push propaganda
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago

I begrudgingly have to concede and acknowledge that you are correct. That being said, he still did so indirectly as his name and ugly fucking face weren't attached to those.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago

Elon Musk = Trump's Rasputin?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

They deserve each other.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

lol trying to fuck with the federal reserve. that didn't take long

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 week ago (1 children)

who view Musk as overly assertive and self-promoting

... that's one way to put it.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Over assertively impregnates employees as a hobby

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 week ago

The only redeeming feature of this whole sorry mess will be watching those hyaenas constantly tearing each other apart.

[–] [email protected] 214 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Please let them be too busy fighting amongst themselves these next four years they just are unable to get anything destructive done.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Maybe Elon is playing a 5D chess long game to reduce Trumps harm and help humanity

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

5D chess to reduce harm done by Trump by.... Getting him elected??

I've actually had similar thoughts but the logic just doesn't add up...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

Normally I would find humor in this statement. Not this regime, bro

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That's the plan. But while the government is ineffective, big businesses will have free reign to fuck us over.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

True...but big business still needs us to buy their products, so we are of some use to them

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 97 points 1 week ago

I am 100% in favor of teenage drama derailing their efforts to remove bodily autonomy from women.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Oh please let Trump's first dictatorial move be to strip Elon of his wealth. We're all going to suffer some shit but let at least one oligarch stuffer too

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

And piss off all the all the billionaires? Not going to happen.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

It's not to piss them off, but to send a message. Just like Putin, he's going to put the screws to somebody wealthy to send the message "I did it to them, I can do it to you."

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You do realize that all the billionaires don't have the same motives. A lot of billionaires would love to get rid of some of their peers.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Would be next to impossible to wound the king billionaire without negatively affecting the others.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It can start by denaturalizing him since he lied on his immigration forms and was in the country illegally when he first came here. That's not even dictatorial, it's the letter of the law.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 week ago

"First they came for the Oligarchs and I did not speak out - because I was not an Oligarch, and really because wage inequality is the core problem facing our society so coming for the Oligarchs seemed like a pretty good idea to me."

[–] [email protected] 145 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I can't really see 2 egos of that size coexisting. I'm terrified of being wrong about that in this case though

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My coping fantasy plays off of their arrogance. Imagine it. On the day of Trump’s inauguration, he admits that climate change is real and shouts, “good luck, suckers,” as he and Musk board a SpaceX rocket bound for Mars.

A guy can dream. lol

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 week ago (5 children)

And it explodes on the launchpad?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

You don't understand though, by being visionaries who disregard accepted margins of safety, they lowered the cost per (attempted) launch by almost 3%!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

And it explodes on the launchpad?

That is an acceptable outcome.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I like to imagine them running out of oxygen and food on Mars after weeks of nonstop arguing, expelling their final, hateful words at each other.

Either way, it’s like having a warm cup of tea under a blanket while I wait out the storm that is my mind.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Any trip to Mars is going to involve massive amounts of personal suffering and privation.

Minimum mission duration of 3 years. Living space no larger than a small RV. All the food is freeze dried. Can you imagine the smell that will develop? If anything breaks, it's on you to fix it, and there is no trip down to the hardware store, and no United Rentals to bail you out. Any medical complication? There's no ER, just whatever you've got in the kit.

And that's not even starting on the chronic radiation hazard for which there is no viable option to deploy shielding. And a freak solar flare can cook you with acute radiation that will kill you at any time.

Seriously, we're talking about an adventure that would be way more epic than Shackleton.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Honestly, I am opposed to sending humans to Mars, period. We shouldn't do it. It's unethical, a tremendous lapse of moral judgment just to stroke our collective egos.

There could be life on Mars NOW. There are bacteria that we know of on Earth, that if you transported them to certain locations deep under the Martian surface, would thrive. There are microbes that live in subterranean saline aquifers on Earth, and there are microbes that live in solid rock miles beneath the Earth's surface. There is no reason that these bacteria couldn't thrive equally well on Mars.

We know of Earth bacteria that could thrive under Mars's surface. Which means it is entirely reasonable to speculate that there may already be bacteria there filling that Martian ecological niche. But if we send people there...we risk contaminating it. We struggle to sterilize our rovers, but we do a pretty good job. But forget trying to sterilize a ship full of dozens of people. Our very gut bacteria are a contamination risk.

No, I think we should leave Mars the hell alone. And really, I think we have a very reasonable path forward for still producing very meaningful and important exploration of Mars. Look at how well robotics is advancing. Look at the recent Tesla event where they had all those robots wandering around, each remotely piloted by a human operator. THAT is the real future of Mars exploration.

I think we should simply wait on Mars until we've let remote presence robotic tech advance a few more decades. Then, you build such a robot that is durable enough to survive in an autoclave. You do send human to Mars, but they stay in orbit. The humans stay on a craft in orbit, and they remotely pilot humanoid robots on the surface to do the actual science work. This way, you can have exploration that has all the dexterity and flexibility of humans, as humans are able to pilot the robots in real time from orbit. And as an added bonus, your exploratory vehicles can be a lot simpler as you don't need to bring any crew or samples back from the Martian surface.

I think we could still exploit Mars as well. If we find that there is no surface life, well then setting up mining activities on the surface isn't a problem. If humans want to colonize Mars, we can build big orbital habitats from materials we mine on the surface. If, after a long period of study, we conclusively rule out the existence of Martian life? Well at that point we can start surface colonization by humans. Or, perhaps we discover a Martian deep-rock biosphere and fully catalogue it. Then maybe we discover that pretty much every terrestrial body has such a biosphere if conditions are appropriate. At that point, humans might decide that colonizing the surface with humans is worth the risk.

Anyway, I really do not support sending humans to Mars. We could potentially wipe out an entire biosphere, a biosphere that if it exists, could tell us remarkable things about how life arises and how common it is in the universe. We're only a few decades out from being able to do really good remote presence robotics. Let's just hold off on things until we can send humans that can get the full experience of being on the Mars surface, without actually being on the Mars surface.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean the King of All Cosmos has a codpiece the size of the moon, so I dunno if he's really a good voice on the subject.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Still smaller than some King Henry VIII when you factor in relative sizes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 92 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Did you see Don's face when Elon was doing his jumping shit? Don's already sick of him, and only keeping him around because he's worth so much.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Donny always needs about tree fitty.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

“So I said, ‘monster, what are you gonna do with tree fitty?’”

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

"Lord it was scary!"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›