this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024
490 points (95.7% liked)

politics

19088 readers
3653 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are we all just assuming these searches are from people who regret their votes and hoped to be able to change it?

I double checked my ballot before submitting it, with full knowledge that irrevocability is the price of anonymity. Nevertheless, I might use similar search terms if I was curious how many other voters, possibly in other states or with different political alignments, had written about regretting their votes. Or, perhaps, ... if I was doing research for a post-election article about the topic.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

That's a great point. The Trump team tried to get all voter information from all states in 2020. Ostensibly to verify voter fraud. But this data was probably used to create such voter suppression systems as Eagle AI.

So they know who you voted for.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is this the "Find out" stage then?

Actions have consequences. Sad people had to figure it out this way.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago

I love it. America’s last hope and people failed. Fuck this place. Let the civil war begin.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 day ago

Once again, these are the a validation headlines that create and support echo chambers. Honestly, what does it matter now?

We already know the regret is strong on this nation and will only get worse.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

What ya'll upset for now? The economy was so good under Trump! Didn't you want him to deport all those "poisonous" immigrants. He's your retribution. And, besides, it's not like Harris would have been any better, because they're the same anyway.

/s

[–] [email protected] 60 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The relative numbers are worth little without knowing the underlying numbers. If it went from 100 to 700 people, that is still negligble. Also crazy how people immediately take that as a base to remove voters rights unless they pass some sort of test. Nothing could go wrong with stripping voters rights amirite?

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago (6 children)

For all future elections I suggest we have one voter - me. I promise to deliver the optimally democratic outcome.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

This but unironically

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 day ago

The republican anti-education campaign bears fruit I see.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago

Something is seriously wrong with civics education in this country. People in power have no incentive to fix it. At least naturalized citizens have to take a fairly stringent test.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (3 children)

I honestly think we should have a 20 question multiple choice basic 8th grade civics quiz before people are allowed to vote. We no longer have an electorate that's informed enough to be capable of voting. Score 60% or higher on that quiz or get the fuck out of the booth.

Edit: I'm incorrect, there's no national requirement that I can find. In CA we can't finish 8th grade without studying and passing a civics test covering this material: https://www.ixl.com/standards/california/social-studies/grade-8. So yeah, I amend my opinion - these standards should be followed nationwide.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ah, yes. One of those good Jim Crow policies.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It would have to be coupled with assurances that all children are fetting and equal civics education to avoid the whole segregated schools being crappy thing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fair enough. IIRC there's a mandatory civics test to complete 8th grade nationwide which was, ostensibly, intended to prevent electoral problems like this

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

This is false.

At most, I see state level requirements like this

And, yeah, poll tests are classic Jim crow tactics.

Here's an example of what to expect from the red states, especially after the Supreme Court gutted the voting rights act.

Instead of blaming the voters that showed up to vote, please reflect on why 10 million people who voted for Biden simply didn't vote for Harris and think about how elitist thoughts like "being too stupid to vote" in a democracy are the root of the problem.

Instead of calling voters stupid, try to understand why they feel hopeless under the current regime so that the Dems can re-establish the working class solidarity and big tent coalition that gave Obama a confortable majority. There is not path to 270 that can neglect the very real and tangible concerns of those "idiots".

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 day ago

God I fucking hate humans

[–] [email protected] 95 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Bloody hell, this is the US version of Brexit... this world would be such a better place if people just did the bare minimum of reading into what they were actually voting for before they fucking voted!

Also, seeing the other top searches being about the tariffs would have me creasing if it weren't so disappointingly stupid that these peoole seemingly knew nothing about Trumps most advertised economic policy before (assumably) voting for him

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 day ago

Whenever I see all the trash on the side of the road, I know why the world is that way.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 64 points 1 day ago (4 children)

How are people this stupid?something in the water?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

Years of GOP meddling with education, which is only gonna nose dive when dept of education gets dismantled

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Some 'murican cities are unironically trying to get rid of fluoride from water. You know, the thing that also goes in toothpaste and is overall good for keeping teeth healthy

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Unfortunately RFK isn't all wrong on this one. Recent evidence is showing it is indeed linked to neurological issues... Furthermore the effects are kind of negated by fluoride in the toothpaste.

https://keck.usc.edu/news/fluoride-exposure-during-pregnancy-linked-to-increased-risk-of-childhood-neurobehavioral-problems-study-finds/

The long-awaited report released Wednesday comes from the National Toxicology Program, part of the Department of Health and Human Services. It summarizes [...] that drinking water containing more than 1.5 milligrams of fluoride per liter is consistently associated with lower IQs in kids.

[...]

Since 2015, federal health officials have recommended a fluoridation level of 0.7 milligrams per liter of water, and for five decades before the recommended upper range was 1.2. The World Health Organization has set a safe limit for fluoride in drinking water of 1.5.

https://apnews.com/article/fluoride-water-brain-neurology-iq-0a671d2de3b386947e2bd5a661f437a5

These margins are razor thin.

https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/still-need-fluoride-drinking-water-benefits-may-waning-study-suggests-rcna173790

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago

RFK Jr, who is likely to be our new head of health and human services, wants to ban it nationally.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago

Don't forget pesticide exposure which eventually has similar effects to lead over time: decreased intelligence and increased aggression

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What annoying about this information is that we can't say who did that. Is it Harris to trump or trump to Harris or those who voted for other options.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think we can reason that its more than likely trump to harris. Not just because trump is a terrible person and lies about everything. But mainly because trump won so what need would there be to change a vote from anything else to trump?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

You underestimate how much people want to be part of "the winning side".

Especially now with how Trump treated those against him

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

I want to see searches of "is it too late to cast my vote?"

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I wonder how many of these people are just now realizing that they have immediate family and friends who won’t be here next Christmas.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Or they, themselves, might wind up getting deported or killed. We've successfully eroded class and even group consciousness.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

"womp womp"

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›