this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
267 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3447 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

On the War Room podcast, right-wing hosts Natalie Winters and Steve Bannon discussed plans for MAGA supporters to act as “shock troops on the streets” to support Trump’s proposed mass deportations of undocumented immigrants.

Winters argued for a broad removal of immigrants beyond just criminals, framing it as essential to the MAGA agenda.

Bannon praised her view and suggested Trump should target the estimated 11-15 million migrants who entered during Biden’s term.

Both hosts emphasized mobilizing their audience to back this agenda both in public and within the administration.

(page 2) 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

Hello Kristallnacht my old friend, I've come to talk with you again...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

National Guard gonna be wishing they enlisted active duty right about now

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 days ago

They miss spelled Sturmabteilung (SA)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

Now the hope is that they are too incompetent to be effective fascists.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

Ah, here comes the SA.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I look forward to seeing the gravy seals put their urban prowess to the test here on the streets of Baltimore.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 days ago

:brown shirts:

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago

Spork troops

[–] [email protected] 62 points 4 days ago (3 children)

If the DNC was thinking ahead even the slightest bit, they'd be planning to do everything they can to publicize the impact Trump's policies are having in real-time. Getting messaging out to everyone who is negatively impacted every time Trump does something, making sure they understand exactly what is happening, and why, would be a lot more effective than their usual strategy of doing nothing until a few months before an election then trying to convince people who've been told for years that democrats are the devil that Trump has been hurting them.

Contact these people personally. "Hi - Trump's policies mean you will no longer be covered by the ACA; here's some information on other, far worse and more expensive, insurance options. This is how much this is likely to cost you. Please contact your representative if you find this to be distressing."

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

When they go low, we so high that no one can see us 👋

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

Needs to be a running social media account like when they live tweeted WWI and WWII.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Time to keep our powder dry. Nixon in '72 and Reagan in '84 both won bigger victories than Trump did last week, but both were brought low within 2 years. Nixon was out of a job. So never lose hope!

[–] [email protected] 30 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I don't think 72 and 84 are good comparisons. By 86, Reagan was well into dementia. Nixon resigned before being impeached or criminally charged.

Trump's accelerating personality disorder will prevent him from resigning. He'll just lash out with greater and greater misplaced vengeance.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If his lashing starts to threaten Republicans, they might consider ousting him before he can start doing things they consider to be real damage. We can hope.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 163 points 4 days ago (9 children)

Can we call them nazis now?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago (2 children)

You can call them little Nazis, as a treat.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 59 points 4 days ago

No, it might hurt their feefees while they're dragging immigrants out to the streets and lynching them

[–] [email protected] 46 points 4 days ago

Yes. We could call them Nazis before, but we can call them Nazis now, too.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 4 days ago

Always could.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 days ago

Shock troops what a novel concept.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›