this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2024
946 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

68442 readers
3096 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"Translation: all the times Tesla has vowed that all of its vehicles would soon be capable of fully driving themselves may have been a convenient act of salesmanship that ultimately turned out not to be true."

Another way to say that, is Tesla scammed all of their customers, since you know, everyone saw this coming...

(page 4) 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

Just recently saw a video of an experimental self driving vehicle from Bosch - from the 90's!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTnBiTIvGqY

You could imagine we'd be much further now, considering how far computing power, computer vision and AI have come.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Surprised if he is truly capable of even this level of self reflection.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Billionaires also fall into the Gartner hype cycle. And convincing a billionaire there’s an opportunity to automate workers out of a job is a quick way to get an injection of cash.

It’s going to be generations before we are actually able to automate most labor. But long, long before that AI will be capable enough to replace overpaid CEO’s.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (3 children)

AI will be capable enough to replace overpaid CEO’s.

How would this play out? The shareholders pay off the current CEO to implement an AI-CEO and step aside?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

McKinsey, Deloitte & co will provide that service.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Maybe. Or companies that are AI ran will outcompete the existing ones.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 143 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (22 children)

First, let me clarify I bought my Tesla used, before Musk went full fascist, and autopilot came free. The car was updated to the newest hardware for free, since the original FSD equipment couldn't do it either.

That out of the way, FSD sucks, and it's getting worse, not better. When if first come out of beta it was okay. I remember describing it as driving with a teenager, they got the general idea, but would make bad decisions so you had to watch them. Years of updates later and it's practically unusable to me. It tries to go way under or over the speed limit, it hesitates or slams on the brakes for green lights. It slams on the brakes for cars that pull out with plenty of gap but doesn't even notice the risky merges. It can not seem to navigate intersections anymore, damn near stopping in the middle of a turn. It actually just updated yesterday and I tried it again, it took me less than 5 miles to disable it again. It is, in my opinion, a hazard to use. I talked to my partner about it and we both agree it didn't used to be this bad.

Anyway, the stupidest part of all this, is they changed it so it's either full self driving all the time or not. You want cruise while you're in traffic because you know it'll try to cut in front of someone? Silly idiot, no you don't. So you now have to have a second profile* for cruise control and lane keep without FSD. And the odd thing is that lane keep and cruise are fine. They function like FSD used to. They can drive the highway with no problem and trust me, I do not have much faith in the car so I'm watching it close. It can't navigate city streets, but neither can FSD....

TLDR, my car was a better deal for me than Tesla. After years of FSD access, it's bad and getting worse, not better. I can't believe people pay 5 figures for it and maybe that's why they feel the need to clip perfect drives or defend it.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (6 children)

Sounds like it'd be nice if you had real control over the car's software, and you could roll it back.

This... also makes me a little more weary driving around Teslas in traffic.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] -4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

they changed it so it's either full self driving all the time or not

No they didn't...you can still activate regular adaptive cruise control without any of the FSD nonsense.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Yes, I said that....

So you now have to have a second profile* for cruise control and lane keep without FSD.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 80 points 5 months ago (8 children)

I think car automation peaked at adaptive cruise control. It's a simple tractable problem that's generally well confined and improves the drivers ability to concentrate on other road risks.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I agree with that. Adaptive cruise and lane keep do reduce road trip fatigue in my experience. Tesla-bros bought the idea that this would be a fully autonomous car and it's not. Rather than learning their lesson and using it as a tool, they put their faith in it anyway, weighting the wheel or whatever to get what they paid for regardless of what the car can reliably do.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Though they can induce another type of driver fatigue - it makes driving boring as heck as you don't need to do anything. I can't use line keep myself as it just makes me really tired and I'll risk falling asleep.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

That's totally fair. I think it depends on the person and what they have going on that day. I remember, or rather do not remember, getting to work in my last car because my brain did the driving task while I was lost in thought. When I'm using lane keep, I feel like I'm hyper aware of what the cars around me are doing and what road changes are coming that I need to manually adjust for. I could see that getting very boring late at night or on empty highways though. Everyone is different and that's just another element of the equation that the car doesn't account for.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] [email protected] 54 points 5 months ago (6 children)

salesmanship

You mean false advertisement

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago

It's pure grift.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 5 months ago

Worse than that. Fraud. He's scammed people out of millions.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 months ago

Or just fraud

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 93 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Can't wait for the supporters to come out and gas light buyers instead: "uh, well of course they couldn't. He didn't lie you just don't understand tech...!

I work in IT and people that think like that can fuck themselves. "What do you mean Meta lied by selling your data to a company you didn't know about. Maybe you should just have never trusted Meta."

Stupid fucking boot lickers.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

To be fair to Meta, they did tell you they might do that. They didn't lie. They just told you in the find print of an already convoluted and arcane legal document that they know most people would never read, fewer would understand, and no one could do anything to change.

So unlike Tesla, where they did lie about FSD's capabilities, and that is at best false advertising but probably actually fraud, Meta at least had a thin veneer of plausible deniability against accusations of being liars when they sold your data to unknown third-parties because they did tell you about it, you just needed a law degree to understand what they were telling you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

No, there won't be endless series of recalls and free upgrades for everyone until they finally achieve it as promised, somewhere between 2050 and 3050...

You have to live with it as it is.

Forever? No. Only for as long as you live.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

My Leaf can handle itself on the highway and it's the perfect amount of self driving that I want. I also didn't need to pay half the price of the leaf for the privilege.

[–] [email protected] 181 points 5 months ago (6 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago

We'll fix that, the car will be driving fully autonomously 2018, promise!

[–] [email protected] 39 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Elon Musks make engineering orders of magnitude more difficult. Those poor Tesla neoslaves

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 84 points 5 months ago (1 children)

"Trust me, you just need to buy more compute for your car. We'll figure out reliable driving by sight someday."

[–] [email protected] 39 points 5 months ago (4 children)

I'm happily using all the sensors my car offers, even if I'm pretty ok with driving by eyesight. Better sensors that can easily see through fog/rain/snow/whatever? Hell yeah, give them to me.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›