this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2024
466 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4400 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A video of Donald Trump calling people close to Kamala Harris "garbage" has resurfaced after Trump criticized Joe Biden for using the same word against Trump supporters.

The clip was posted on X, formerly Twitter, by the anti-Trump conservative group The Lincoln Project. It shows a portion of Trump's rally in Mosinee, Wisconsin, on September 7.

Trump discussed the possibility of Harris winning the presidency, and went on to say, "It's not her, it's the people that surround her. They're scum. They are scum, and they want to take down our country. They are absolute garbage."

all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Maga sees themselves as both normal and better than everyone. The double standard is all they want and care about. Its why they fake outrage at "garbage" but cry like weenies when called "weird" and "creepy"

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

So the timeline is:

  1. To all the people around Harris: "They are absolute garbage"
  2. Let's also call Puerto Rico an "island of garbage"
  3. We are too dumb to understand basic grammar, in response to the rhetoric in point 2. being called garbage
  4. Let's near enough keel over trying to reach the door handle of a garbage truck

Yep, that's the Republican Party.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He definitely got that garbage truck all gussied up quick...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

You know, he was at a church close to my neighborhood (in suburban Atlanta) earlier this week. That church looked just fine. It was painted a tan color with some darker accent color. About 2 weeks ago it was painted stark white.

Interesting.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

It’s sickly funny in a way that the 268-270 SunBelt RustBelt scenario is probably the most likely Harris win scenario(it’s what the polls are predicting). Had a couple local politicians in Nebraska 2 months ago made a different choice and changed to Winner Take All that would be a 269-269 tie leading to a Trump win.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

The conservative pearls will remained clutched.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Trump supporters should not be hauling garbage.

They should be hauled off AS garbage.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Watch it, Koloth, or Trumpy will punch you right in the kisser!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I also got the reference instantly. 😂

https://youtu.be/Ecbta8ucd0Y

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago

It's the Eric Cartman party. They've been saying things like this for years and a single taste of their own medicine (from an old man who probably didn't mean to give it) and I hear Cartman falling on the ground crying.

[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I find it fascinating that the one of the most consistent groups that I hear about playing hardball with Trump is a conservative group - The Lincoln Project. Like, do we not have any sort of "we play dirty" liberal groups that dig up shit like this to show Trump's hypocrisy? The Lincoln Project is buying billboards, they are all over the news week after week? We need a liberal party with that same sort of girthy, 12" dick swinging energy.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Keep in mind that the Lincoln Project are not your friends. They may be temporary allies, but only because the enemy of our enemy is an ally. If Trump loses, get used to them getting back to their same Republican bullshit.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago

see my comment above

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

tribalism is a bitch to beat, especially from the inside....love these guys but want to be their opposition....

[–] [email protected] 96 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Nah, didn't you hear? This is all Biden's fault, actually.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Well I'm not going to vote for Biden after that "garbage" comment he made. Such violent rhetoric.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Not only him, but I'm not voting for Hunter, either!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

How dare he!

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 week ago

Newsweek - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Newsweek:

Wiki: reliable - There is consensus that articles from Newsweek pre-2013 are generally reliable for news covered during that time. In 2011, Newsweek was a reputable magazine with only some minor problems while it was owned by The Newsweek Daily Beast Company (which also owned The Daily Beast). Blogs under Newsweek, including The Gaggle, should be handled with the WP:NEWSBLOG policy. See also: Newsweek (2013–present).
Wiki: mixed - Unlike articles before 2013, Newsweek articles since 2013 are not generally reliable. From 2013 to 2018, Newsweek was owned and operated by IBT Media, the parent company of International Business Times. IBT Media introduced a number of bad practices to the once reputable magazine and mainly focused on clickbait headlines over quality journalism. Its current relationship with IBT Media is unclear, and Newsweek's quality has not returned to its status prior to the 2013 purchase. Many editors have noted that there are several exceptions to this standard, so consensus is to evaluate Newsweek content on a case-by-case basis. In addition, as of April 2024, Newsweek has disclosed that they make use of AI assistance to write articles. See also: Newsweek (pre-2013).


MBFC: Right-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America


Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-comments-garbage-kamala-harris-1977791
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support