this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
626 points (95.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

2860 readers
638 users here now

Welcome to [email protected], where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (5 children)

Trump wants me to sell out my country for less than $50k?!? How is that money going to help me when living in the country becomes unbearable and my dollar is worth a fraction of what it does today?

EDIT: The problem is the suburban $139k bracket, living paycheck to paycheck and in debt up to their eyeballs. That $1000 difference might look real juicy to those guys.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 53 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Republicans making $35k a year: "but wHeRE is The iNcEnTiVE to bE sUcCeSsFuL????!!!"

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago

They also believe that Jesus might make them rich so best be prepared.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago

Now compare that with the inflation their economic plans will cause. 100 or 1000% tarrifs will turn most of Trump's greens to red real quick

[–] [email protected] 169 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Of all the things that have changed since Reagan took office, it's nice to see that 'fiscal responsibilty' still means massive unfunded tax cuts for the people who need them the very least.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 105 points 6 months ago (2 children)

IMO, it should incorporate a logarithmic target at homelessness in the entire nation. Those in the top brackets have no right to obscene wealth while anyone is lying in a gutter or going hungry.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I'd argue, since we are an empire and the world's super power both militarily and economically, we shouldn't have any billionaires or even hundred millionaires while people are dying of starvation/malnutrition anywhere in the world.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 78 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The crazy thing is, there would still be obscenely rich people. They just wouldn't be quite as obscenely rich.

[–] [email protected] 71 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The real key is, they wouldn't miss it at all. Yet they hang on every bit of it.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 6 months ago (3 children)

This is what I'm always saying. The more dollars you have, the less each one matters. Going from 40k to 50k is a big jump. Going from 400k to 500k is a bigger jump in absolute numbers, but will make far less of an difference.

I knew a guy who told me that "his family struggled, too" when both parents were bringing home mid six figures. I'm sorry but like what. Learn to budget.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

When money still means money to someone, it's definitely possible to have a lot coming in and yet still be budgeted bad enough that they could be living a paycheck to paycheck scenario. Or worse, living well past their means because of credit extensions, far in debt. For the very wealthy money becomes less of a thing to worry about and more one of many ways to leverage power and influence. These are the ones where a heavier tax doesn't hurt, because they simply have more than they can lose, even if they don't have most of it as tangible cash. That wealth line is far above the millionaire mark, and there's not a lot of them, but they hold most of the wealth of the world, and also the power they desire. They could change things without a loss, and they don't.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 months ago (2 children)

According to this, those making 100k (33.6% of Americans) will be getting less money. The 66.4% of Americans will be getting significantly more.

Via zippa

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (4 children)

I'm assuming you mean they will be getting a lower portion of the increases? The chart you have here looks more like how many people fall in a given bracket.

It makes plenty of sense to shift things to greater gains on the lower end. A while back there was a study that said somewhere around $75K was the point at which actual income gains start to level off as far as what improvements it makes to your life. At that point you can probably pay your bills and afford to eat without stressing so much over every decision. I forget if that was for a single person or what, but for where I live it would be doable to be sure. Lower than that and you need that extra boost to just meet the basic needs.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

My guess is with inflation 75K is no longer the ceiling for the amount you make before you level off as far as happiness and comfort go. Still, billionaires don't really need to exist either way. 🤷🏼‍♀️

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 58 points 6 months ago (6 children)

As a programmer and my wife is a doctor, I'm in the upper brackets. But I don't care. Also happy to see the millionaires losing even more money!

In my eyes, $3000 goes a long way for someone struggling!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

It's not losing, it's sharing.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›