this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
206 points (97.2% liked)

politics

19107 readers
3314 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump's narcissism knows no bounds.

It’s no secret that Donald Trump is a big fan of himself. Countless mental health professionals, and even fellow Republicans, have diagnosed the former president as a raging narcissist. But new photos that have been circulating on social media probably demonstrate Trump’s narcissism in the most direct way possible. Trump’s iPhone wallpaper is just a photo of himself.

For context, the photo is from the height of Trump’s family separation policy for migrants, which forcibly separated children from their parents at the border, placing them in the same kind of camps Trump has sworn to bring back. When the photo was taken, Trump’s lawyers at the U.S. Department of Justice had just argued in court that the U.S. government had no responsibility to provide kids in custody with soap or toothpaste. They also argued that it was unnecessary to give migrants beds or cots while they slept on the ground in overcrowded government-run cages. You know, the good old days of Trump.

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Why is his smile so off-putting? Is this the first time I've actually seen it?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

He looks like Grandma

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

You should see what he jerks off to.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 hours ago

We've already seen pictures of his daughter.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 hours ago

That's just so he remembers it's his phone. "Hey, that's me, pointing at me!"

Based and dementiapilled

[–] [email protected] 33 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

This is not surprising, but funny because it's so on brand as to make you go "of course that's his wallpaper. Of course."

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 hours ago

I asked my SO what she thought his wallpaper might be. First answer: himself.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Embarrassing for Don but unsurprising.

Now, that there are other people in the millions who would also put Don on their phones, walls, and shrines is beyond embarrassing for the USA.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I'm kind of surprised it's not his daughter.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not surprised it's not his wife.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I'm surprised you'd think that he and Melania are on speaking terms.

Watching her degrade and snipe at him has been one of the few pleasures of the Trump Era.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago
[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

That's in a different folder

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 hours ago

“Totally not porn”

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago

"Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull"

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 hours ago
[–] [email protected] -3 points 6 hours ago

Gizmodo - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Gizmodo:

Wiki: reliable - There is consensus that Gizmodo is generally reliable for technology, popular culture, and entertainment. There is no consensus on whether it is generally reliable for controversial statements. There is consensus that AI-generated articles are generally unreliable; Gizmodo's parent company, G/O Media, began releasing such pieces in July 2023, usually under the byline "Gizmodo Bot".[17]


MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America


Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://gizmodo.com/donald-trumps-iphone-wallpaper-is-just-a-photo-of-himself-2000515029
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support