this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
611 points (95.8% liked)

politics

19100 readers
4640 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

No video released yet but the right wing blog-sphere is already claiming it's AI. Put on your seat-belts and keep your hands inside the car at all times.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 20 hours ago (8 children)

No, I don't buy it. He's awful. He's a fascist. He has assaulted lots of women (when there were no cameras). I don't believe he'd be this self-destructive at this moment when he needs to win to stay out of prison.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 19 hours ago

You don't think the famously stupid person could do something stupid? I know it's a stretch but cmon

[–] [email protected] 14 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

yeah I don't buy it either. a) I don't trust anything on TikTok b) Why is everyone talking about a video when a video doesn't seem to exist? If it exists show it

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 49 points 20 hours ago (7 children)

His sycophants forgive any crime he commits. They will blame the minor not him.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 20 hours ago

Obviously a liberal sleeper agent

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Perhaps explains his seemingly defeated attitude recently. His canceling of multiple events. His comment at yesterday's rally...

Trump: I realized our time is coming to an end. In many ways it’s sad. I’ve been doing this for 9 years.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

He's bragged about doing it before. I don't see how this would affect his popularity.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 20 hours ago

It isn't, in fact despite the video not being released it's already being "debunked" as AI on Far Right websites.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

This is just conspiratorial garbage. That article is garbage. I would love for something like this to take him down, but if you think this has any credibility, please realize that your ability to critically analyze new information is ridiculously clouded by confirmation bias.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 19 hours ago

It’s such a waste of time

“Without proof, claims of video of event exists”

And then it’s just random people on twitter

[–] [email protected] -2 points 21 hours ago

Sure there's video. There's a pee tape too. Just like the tooth fairy and a politician that cares. They all exist.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

Did Charlie Kirk tweet that? If so, I'd believe it's 100% for real and they're trying to get out in front of it. Like many posters below point out, his base won't care.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago

The tweet is vague. We've seen ai been used already in this election to spread misinformation, so it's saying Democrats might do so could refer to literally anything.

But when put in the context of this supposed tape, it dishonestly makes it sound like they are talking about it.

Don't get me wrong, I'd be happily wrong about this, but this is literally nothing right now.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

The fact that the some of the most immoral spin-doctors that aren't directly related to the Trump campaign -- Posobiec and Kirk for starters -- are clearly trying to get out in front of some sort of bad news that, based on their comments, appears to be a video grants more weight to claims than this random article.

That being said, whether there is actually a video or they're reacting to the same rumored threat is unknown. Even if it were true, I honestly don't know if it would make enough of a difference for Trump's supporters. And, again if true, the longer they hold the video and allow advance spin and damage control to run unopposed, the less effect it will have. The simple fact is that Trump supporters would then be looking for any reason to simple dismiss/ignore it, and they will undoubtedly be given many reasons by affiliates of Trump's campaign.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

are clearly trying to get out in front of some sort of bad news that, based on their comments, appears to be a video grants more weight to claims than this random article.

This is a lot of assumptions. They are constantly saying Democrats are about to do something bad. It's part of their shtick, and they are just trying to keep people afraid.

But even if we agree and they are clearly trying to get out in front of something that doesn't make anything we put into that hole "has more weight."

[–] [email protected] 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Trump spin-doctors are specifically referencing that democrats are going to release an "AI-generated" piece of media. I'm assuming that means they're worried something might be released soon. That's it, I'm not putting anything in a "hole," I'm just waiting to see what they're trying to get in front of.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

We have two people, who often claim Democrats are about to do something bad, tweeting that Democrats are about to do something bad. This isn't "clearly getting ahead of something" it could just be their typical fear mongering.

You also said that this "fact" gives the claim more weight, but it still could be referring to literally anything.

All we have is some "social media users" saying there is a tape and misleading via context claims that 2 of the hundreds of right wing spin doctors are vaguely referencing a video.

It's absolutely nothing at this point

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This could actually get him more votes. After all, the GOP is the Party of Pedophila.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

They're the party of "PEDOPHILES SHOULD BE KILLED, DEAD PEDOPHILES CAN'T REOFFEND, I HUNT PEDOPHILES, AND IT'S TOTALLY NORMAL AND NOT PROJECTION THAT I'VE MADE THIS MY ENTIRE IDENTITY." Which is effectively the same thing but is slightly different.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

PEDOPHILES SHOULD BE KILLED, DEAD PEDOPHILES CAN'T REOFFEND, I HUNT PEDOPHILES

Always weirds me the fuck out when I see this stuff. Like, my dude, pedophiles are quite universally reviled, even amongst hardcore criminals, why the hell do you feel the need to loudly signal this ?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 20 hours ago

, why the hell do you feel the need to loudly signal this ?

Same reason they always do this: projection

[–] [email protected] 6 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

You know why they feel the need to loudly signal it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 20 hours ago

Yeah that is definitely a rhetorical question here

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›