this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
465 points (92.0% liked)
Microblog Memes
5771 readers
1858 users here now
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
Rules:
- Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
- Be nice.
- No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
- Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.
Related communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Omg can people start doing this to like, random men? Politicians? Actors? Scientists? Please 😂
Glamour shots
Fuck is a “woke dei”?
"Woke" originally meant "aware of and well-informed about systemic social issues affecting everyday people". Conservatives have co-opted this word and use it to describe anything associated with leftism or social liberalism. It is intended to be negative in that context.
"DEI" stands for "diversity, equity, and inclusion". It refers to policies that intentionally include people of diverse or minority backgrounds in the context of employment or political appointment. Conservatives use it to describe (in their view) hiring practices that select less-qualified candidates of these backgrounds against the favour of those who may be more qualified. In that usage, a "DEI hire" or "diversity hire" is a person hired or appointed solely on the basis of their race, gender, or some other status as a minority even though they are not qualified for the role.
Conservatives use “woke” to mean the same thing leftists mean when they say “redpilled”: edgy people roleplaying enlightenment instead of actually seeking it.
DEI hire is actually supposed to be “if you have a choice between two candidates who are equally qualified, you choose the one which adds diversity to your team”. There’s nothing in DEI hire about choosing the less qualified person. If anything, from what I’ve seen people who are non-white usually have more degrees and qualifications than their white colleagues. I mean, look at Kamala Harris vs. Donald Trump right now…
I was once heard of a team where two equally, incredibly talented candidates were options. One of them had the same name as two other people on the team so they picked the other guy. Can't have three John's ya know?
(The name wasn't John, it was a fairly uncommon name, which made it waaaaay funnier)
In the most technical sense, that was DEI hire.
That's true in reality, but in the minds of those who use it to diminish people, the implication is that race was the deciding factor - because of course, to them, only whites are competent, so there's no other reason anyone else could have been chosen.
Diversity, something inclusion I think. Their latest obsession
equality?
Equity
ah yes
Equine Influenza
edibles
It's what conservatives say instead of the n-word.
Indeed.
Am I the only one who would find the woman at the left more attractive?
The right just looks like plastic to me, same with all of these instagram influencer ladies who have more plastic surgeries than I have fingers.
Yeah the woman on the right just looks like a psychopath
With the right plastic surgeon you could have more fingers…
The woman on the left looks strong, determined and capable.
The woman on the right looks disingenuous, fake and somehow predatory.
That's the joke.
This is a parody of twitter posts made by actual "anti DEI/woke" dipshits. The format is identical to their posts "fixing" modern female video game characters that don't look like sex dolls.
People can look however they would like, whether that's plastic or dust bowl struggle chic. What's wrong here is that an unrelated party has decided to change someone's appearance based on their own preferences.
I think the rules are a little different when you decide to make your appearance the product. Instagram Models or models in general make themselves out to be an ideal and a image for other people, especially children to strive for. That makes criticism of them valid while if they were just going about their day, it wouldn't be. Doesn't help that the filters make these images impossible to achieve.
Maybe it's because these generations of which I'm a part are struggling financially and will likely end up in the gutter due to crumbling support systems or because we're staring down the double barrel of the imminent repercussions of ignoring climate change and the reinforcing systemic barriers to overcome it, but I just learned that "dust bowl chic" (and consent, already known) really does it for me.
Man, Stalin would have loved this tech... Even with just film, the USSR was able to make some impressive photo edits to remove politicians that Stalin had "purged," from previous photographs.
Because I guess that means they never existed?
My very first job back in the late 90s after art school involved erasing people out of corporate annual photos using Photoshop.
So no... it's not just Stalin.
Adobe announced a 'distraction removal' Photoshop feature this week at their annual MAX conference. Makes removing people from pictures a one-click operation for anyone: https://helpx.adobe.com/photoshop/using/remove-tool.html
view more: next ›