this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
1511 points (95.4% liked)

Political Memes

8863 readers
1797 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Posts like this are literally driving a wedge into the people who don't want the bus to fall off the cliff, and dividing them.

This has to be a psyop launched by cliff voters, right? They are probably laughing looking at y'all tearing into each other....

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Well yeah but the one of the people who voted for ice cream downvoted a post about gaza one time so CLEARLY the entire bus sacrificing themselves just in case it might save gaza is the better option. Also there's an atomic bomb factory in a heavily populated area at the bottom of the cliff so basically the same amount of people as the entire population of gaza are going to die if this happens but protecting Gaza is more important than protecting loved ones apparently.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (10 children)

The people who want to get ice cream are also helping a psychopath murder innocent civilians so it's a bit of a toss up

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

It really isn't

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Which side do you think is more realistic to change later on? The people who want ice cream, at the very least, want to live.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 days ago

How are we at a point in time where adults need this explained to them..

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Yeah.... But also, Carlin was right saying this shit is all a stage. We've got groups of bullies picking on us, and I'd rather throw bricks than help them decide who to pick on next.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago

I keep being told I'm a fascist for voting for the harm reduction by people on lemmy though.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (5 children)

If "harm" and "less harm" are the only two options, then the only question is how quickly you die. There's the argument that we have to do "harm reduction" in order to buy time to organize for something better, but we've been procrastinating for decades apparently. Since all of history informs us that humans act only when inaction is no longer tenable (and sometimes not even then), really the only material difference between "harm reduction" and accelerationism is, again, the timeline.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago

The harm or less harm are thanks to Ordinal voting.

First Past the Post is the absolute worst offender, but every single Ordinal voting system will eventually devolve into a forced choice between this or that.

Thankfully there are Cardinal voting systems. Those always boil down to the word and. For example, I can say that I support getting ice cream, and sandwiches, and a slushy, and even just finishing the route, but not going over that cliff.

My support for any given item is counted independently of my support for any other option.

To see what option wins, you just look at total support.

Different Cardinal systems have their own little quirks, but the key in all of them is that ability to give multiple items identical levels of support.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago

Indeed, "word up." Although, the voting machines received upgrades and who knows what really occurred.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Everyone's upset about the vegan ice cream voters not voting for regular ice cream.

No one is upset at the regular ice cream people for being unwilling to vote for a vegan ice cream place because their choice is default in their mind.

Both sides are holding each other hostage. One has a moral reason and the other just doesn't want to compromise.

And yet.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Thats not a viable choice though.

The viable choices were ice cream or cliff. Choosing vegan ice cream is functionally equivalent to not voting.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Genocide isn't a viable choice.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I’m kinda upset about the cliff-driver voters too tbf

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

And yet, we’re careening towards our death now. You’ve proven the point, well done.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's time for the lesser evil to choose no evil for once.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

sharp as a carrot this one

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›