this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
1055 points (99.5% liked)

Science Memes

11047 readers
3622 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

some papers are almost like they are trying to keep the core idea a secret

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

Unfortunately there's a bit of pressure to osbficate the core idea of a publication in academia. While the ideal academics try to hold themselves to is to freely exchange information, for researchers who are paid to study very neiche topics there's an insensitive to put some resistance into others entering their field. There is only so much funding and one more team means more competition. So some researchers who find themselves in that position will intentionally complicate their published work as a way to create a disincentive to others from crowding their field. It sucks but the reality is that funding and money come before the faithful pursuit of knowledge.

Also, some people just suck at writing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

As a (perhaps unintentional) slip, "an insensitive" works rather well here. Gatekeeping your field in a forum of open(ish)^1^ information exchange is just categorically "not nice".

Personally, I would have opted for a portmanteau like "incentsitive".


^1^ - Paywalls notwithstanding.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago

It doesn't fit in context, they clearly meant incentive.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

Bad grammar nazi, there are several other typos! Bad!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago

I just catch the ones the news with my dyslexia.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I'm currently writing a small literature review on tgf-b and SMAD signalling in cancer for uni rn

And I'm really confused why this one paper's talking about how miR-520h induces the tgf-b/smad7 pathway but also binds to and suppresses smad7

Like why on earth is it activating the tgf-b/smad7 pathway, a pathway that stops stuff like the epithelial mesenchynal transition, if it's just going to bind to smad7 anyway???

Worst thing is, I can't find any other papers on why this actually happens

I swear I'm just dumb at times ;-;

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 weeks ago

Cell signalling pathways was the worst part of microbial genetics for me. Luckily I don't have to deal with that anymore as my day to day is digital PCR and NGS.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 weeks ago

Ah, yes. Of course. I understand your frustration entirely because of my deep understanding of the specific situation.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Would a list of tools and search engines be helpful?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

That would be very helpful 🥴

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Sorry, better late than never. Will dm you. Others are welcome too.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago

I'll take two scoops

load more comments
view more: next ›