this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
381 points (99.5% liked)

politics

19043 readers
3594 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 48 minutes ago

I hate the guy, It scares me shitless that he may be elected, but we must admit that creating the "weave" thing to sell his mental decline as a brilliant oratorial strategy is a genius marketing move. The problem is that he is selling exploding Ford Pintos as the safest car in the world.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 hours ago

The Orange Shit Stain and his body language says it all. Kudos to the journalist for sticking to the subject and keeping the POS in line.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 11 hours ago

"They're eating the dogs. And can we get some music?"

/dances to opera

[–] [email protected] 71 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Trump responded by sighing and ranting about Virginia’s voter rolls. “The question is about Google, President Trump,” Micklethwait replied. Trump then went on a spiel about how Google is unfair to him and doesn’t show users any positive stories about him.

There are no positive articles about him that aren't from horribly biased sources.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 11 hours ago

One time Google's snippet for Republican described Nazis. This enraged the Republicans and Google manually changed it. But it was auto generated from stuff the GOP was really saying, and still are.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 13 hours ago

A journalist had to answer a question from the public on the subject in a Canadian special on US elections and his answer was "Look, I'm a journalist, I report facts and if you believe I'm biased because all the news coming from the republican side are bad news I would tell you I'm not the one who chose the candidate that generates these bad news, my job is just to report them, nothing else."

[–] [email protected] 22 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

LOL that photo

he's such a fucking whiny baby

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Looks like a toddler refusing to put on his shoes.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 hours ago

why put on your shoes when you can get some other cunt to do it for you. just tell them you'll pay them LOL

[–] [email protected] 10 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Is there a video? I like to watch him get progressively unstable.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

If you can stomach it

https://youtu.be/cGgxTFYF844

I don't need further proof to know he's an idiot

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I'm gonna try to watch this later. I give myself 3 minutes before I give up. Thanks for sharing the link.

Update: I made it about 20 minutes into the "interview" and had to stop. The gish gallop is hard with Trump and there's no way I could listen to it for a full hour.

[–] [email protected] 84 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

He's truly a man of the people. Turns out the people of America are dumb.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

I don't know who upvotes you, but let me remind you that the Trumpers are the minority in America. Always have, always will.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Bro literary got over 45% of votes.

Edit: And is likely to again

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 48 minutes ago

How very clever of them.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Yes! We also have dumb people who don't support Trump.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

And a whole other group of dumb people who also support nothing and do absolutely nothing to encourage or support anything and just stand back and watch the world burn.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

These people have put political signs everywhere around here that say “Vote Cupcakes” or “Vote Cookies for president”

They think it’s all a joke

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago

Maybe if we stopped electing clowns...

[–] [email protected] 83 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

They are people of the land. The common clay of the new West. You know ....

[–] [email protected] 41 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Thanks for the opening. "Morons!"

[–] [email protected] 17 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Possibly the best line of dialog ever spoken from a movie screen.

[–] [email protected] 131 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

The grilling exposed Trump’s total cluelessness with regard to his own economic policy, and led Trump to attack Micklethwait as biased.

Yes the notably socialist empire of Bloomberg, used by communist stock traders around the world, is biased against the totally rational and very cool Trump economic “plan”.

Maybe adopting failed economic policies from the 1920s (and older) isn’t a winning formula?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 13 hours ago (6 children)

That's the one group I don't understand, the finance guys, business owners, stock analysts, etc. How can they possibly be on team Trump? You want some certainty in the market, not some dementia patient steering the wheel with Christian Nationalists like Stephen Miller whispering directions in his ear.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 hour ago

For some of the ultra-wealthy (Theil, Altman, Andreessen, Eric Schmidt, OpenAI board, etc), a type of accelerationism seems to be in-vogue (e/acc publicly, and probably accelerationist thoughts like The Dark Enlightenment privately). I think some ultra-wealthy are just trying to hedge their bets (Zuckerberg, and news corporations come to mind), because if Trump does win he'll definitely try to use his power to harm companies he doesn't like. I think others, such as Musk, want to be Russian-style oligarchs. I guess all this is kinda related; accelerate into some sort of collapse or chaos, use their positions to maneuver into greater power and become oligarchs or create corporate-city-states, or whatever stupid shit they believe in.

I think finance workers are about as split between the parties as the rest of the population; probably more socially liberal. Small bussiness owners are some of the most ignorant and authoritarian people I've encountered.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 hours ago

He creates turmoil and doubt, which is fertile ground for scams and cons.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

“What does The Wall Street Journal know? They’ve been wrong about everything, and so have you by the way, you’ve been wrong,” Trump replied, crossing his arms and curling into his seat.

Ah, yes, the well known unreputable, woke, liberal extremist publication, the Murdoch-owned Wall Street Journal.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

A lot of people with a high degree of expertise in one area are deficient in other areas, but wrongly assume they are geniuses in all areas.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 hours ago

I just assume I'm a dipshit across the board so I can be pleasantly surprised any time I do something competently

[–] [email protected] 26 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

That's the one group I don't understand, the finance guys, business owners, stock analysts, etc. How can they possibly be on team Trump?

Tax cuts for the rich

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Lot of fucking good that's going to do them when nobody can afford to buy their shit

Who are you going to sell to? Because it ain't me, and it ain't 99% of the rest of the American people. So if these rich fucks want to chase their infinite paycheck, they're going to need some revenue.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Ahh but for one glorious quarter, profits will be through the roof. The collapse of democracy afterwards will be an unfortunate market adjustment

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 hours ago

Ah the ol’ pump-and-dump-a-roo

[–] [email protected] 5 points 13 hours ago

Cocaine’s a hell of a drug.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 10 hours ago

I love this video so much. The interviewer asks Shapiro to defend his stances and Shapiro responds by calling the interviewer a liberal.

"A Georgia law you support would have women who had a miscarriage face trail for potentialy 30 years in jail. Isn't that a bit harsh?"

"Oh, sorry, I didn't know you were A LIBERAL!"

[–] [email protected] 18 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Knowing Neil’s background and then watching this video gives one truly one of the most delicious viewings of all time.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I watched it without and it was still interesting. What's Neil's background? Seemed like a super nice old guy.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I believe Andrew Neil himself is rather conservative. So Shapiro accusing him of being a liberal is... even more absurd.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 57 minutes ago

I liked the part where he said that theres not much money in broadcast news in Britain, unlike in the states. Sort of framed the perspectives in a great way.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 15 hours ago

Rolling Stone - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Rolling Stone:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/trump-crumbles-pressed-economic-policy-bloomberg-interview-1235134459/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support