Heads up this article is 4 months old, just in case you were feeling some deja vu.
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
Oh oops, didn't see the date was a bit ago. I saw it linked elsewhere online first and didn't catch that it was from june when reading the article
Didn't this asshole just "truth" about 60 minutes doing this for Harris? How on the nose is the whole "Every accusation is a confession" is it with these people?!
Since they can only think about themselves, they cannot think of someone taking an action that they didn't already do
I've been interviewed several times by traditional media in my own political work. It's very common to basically get a mulligan if you have what they call a "false start". Unless the network is just out to do a hit piece on you. Anyway, yea, Trump more or less is always confessing when he makes any kind of accusation.
The answer in question:
https://video.snapstream.net/Play/aMibWh18oRCDyb3A6fMoDU?accessToken=uurt9j9a9tan
Aren't you linking to Fox News airing it?
They've SINCE edited it out, what don't you get?
From the article, it says this clip was aired after the original interview.
And this clip isn't on their website in this format anymore
But the article is talking about what was aired, and now you're moving the goal posts requiring me to hunt around their website.
It's fine, I don't want to really defend them as they've done plenty to defend trump. But to talk down to me with the "what don't you get?" When you're just floundering all over the place,talking about things the article is not about, seems quite misplaced.
It's the same goalposts as the original article
From the article:
The exchange, part of a June 2 sit-down with Fox & Friends, was cut from the original TV broadcast but later reappeared in full on Will Cain's Fox News radio show.
Why lie?
And then I noticed that she was sitting on...her..sweet...can...oh just thinking about that sweet can...
Surprised they didn't use AI to redo the whole answer and then blame Kamala for it if they ever got caught
Is this the crooked lamestream media he keeps rattling on about?
Fox Skews
I would expect nothing less from them.
Christian Fascist state media, without the state (so far).