this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2024
1120 points (98.3% liked)

People Twitter

6699 readers
810 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Right one does not depend on the left one. 3rd dimension for the win!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

There's perils in being in 3d

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 49 points 5 months ago (4 children)
[–] [email protected] 67 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (5 children)

It pisses me off to no end that what is CLEARLY shown as a 90degree angle is not in fact 90deg, I hate it when they do that.

Also I will sadly admit this can teach people lessons about verifying the information themselves.

^GrumbleGrumbleGrumble....^

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (6 children)

I get you, but it doesn't clearly indicate the angle in the middle at the base as much as it suggestively waggles its eyebrows towards 90⁰, it could just as easily be 89.9999999999999⁰, although upon zooming in, you can see the line does shift one pixel over on its way up. You simply can't trust any of the angles as 90⁰ unless it's got the ∟ symbol (that's the official unicode) or you've measured them yourself, and with that one pixel off-set, it's decidedly not 90⁰. That's why you have to do the math.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That's just what I said but more into the weeds on the detail.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

Another way to look at it is that it is simply a representation of an object. We don't need to visualize the angles, as the values to the other asks are given. We just need the geometry of the object represented so we can calculate the value of the unlabeled angle. Given that the geometry of the objects is represented as triangles, we can infer that all sides are straight lines, regardless of the type of space the object occupies.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Am I stupid or is one triangle unnecessary?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

It is necessary. In the left triangle, the angle that is shown to be right is actually 80°, since other angles are 60 and 40, totaling 100.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

That just means the drawing us wrong, because that is a right angle there

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago

It's not wrong. It's just not right.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I like that all the comments are people discussing the diagram.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago
[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

For the love of dog, you can't solve this problem without making assumptions that fundamentally change the answer. People are too quick to spot the first error and then make assumptions that are conveniently consistent with the correction.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The only assumption needed to solve the problem is that the bottom line is indeed straight. Generally it will never be assumed in these types of learning practices that a straight line is a lie, because at that point you can never do a single problem ever. However an undefined angle can be cheesed.

Though it still bugs me on a fundamental level they will cheese the angle to bait a person into a wrong answer, it can teach a valuable lesson about verifying information.

We can solve this issue of a straight line being guaranteed by doing this. This actually is probably a really good practice considering the exacting nature of certain disabilities such as ADHD and Autism. However if you live in the US you need to just accept things like this because we will NEVER fund public education properly let alone consider accessibility beyond things mandated by the ADA

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›