this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024
365 points (97.2% liked)

politics

19234 readers
2227 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

US presidential candidate Donald Trump said he would appoint Elon Musk to head a government efficiency commission if he is elected to office in November.

“At the suggestion of Elon Musk, who has given me his complete and total endorsement… I will create a government efficiency commission tasked with conducting a complete financial and performance audit of the entire federal government and making recommendations for drastic reforms,” Trump told the Economic Club of New York.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

"Too efficient. Let's put a moron in charge to shake that up."

Fuck man, we already tried that in 2016.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago

So, he basically bought himself a job in our government. I kinda want to say that’s illegal, but this is the circus we live in now. Complaining about the clowns is probably a waste of time at this point

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So if Trump is elected the USA will be run like Twitter

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

*Xitter (pronounced shitter)

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

That's fine, I already have a million reasons to vote against him, what's a million and one?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

Didn't Trump fill that roll by just not filling a huge portion of the government?

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 months ago

Imagine if the people in charge of our country took it seriously instead of whatever this clown show is.

Can't wait to vote Kamala, and least she won't make things worse.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago

That tracks as they're both petulant children who know nothing about running a business...except how to torpedo them with their own hubris and ineptitudes after losing gobs of money. Hopefully, after this exhausting and long-winded election cycle is over we can never hear their stupid names or voices again!

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If you don't like it, vote.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 2 months ago

Our government isn't a meme you incel fuck. That clown is exhausting.

[–] [email protected] 82 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Translation: "I got an endorsement and a lot of money from Elon Musk, so I'm giving him a government job as a kickback where he can "regulate" his own businesses to enrich himself even further at the expense of literally every other American."

Oh man, I can't see a conflict of interest at all. Nope, no siree.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago

He is maintaining his record of putting the worst possible person he can find in positions of power.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

Betsy Devos but worse

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Dear Donald J. Numbskull: the fact that Elon never sleeps and kisses your ass does not mean he's efficient, or even understands the concept.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Trump has never cared about hiring people who are efficient. He hires them if they pay him. His administration was filled with industry representatives, who were in positions where they decided regulation of their own businesses. Corruption all the way down.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Christ, what an absolutely terrible idea. Of course the magachuds would be stroking off to such an idea...

[–] [email protected] 41 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think hiring the CEO of MULTIPLE Businesses who bought a WEBSITE for $44000000000 and has MULTIPLE Government Contracts to a Government Role is a BIGLY SMART Move with LITERALLY no Downside or room for Swampy Activity!

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

He's good at promising without delivering, which is great if your idea of government efficiency is "have the best press while embezzling tons of money".

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

The Russian state should be a warning not a guide to model after.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

His way of making the government efficient will be to just have no bid contracts go to all of his businesses.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Which is the safest thing to do since he has name recognition....

Source: I worked in a contracting office and literally these words have been spoken by almost every contracting official.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago

God could you imagine.

Vote.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Not that it matters to his supporters buy he litterally said that he can be bought for a couple of pretty words.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 months ago

He just wants to be able to shut down the FAA, who keeps enforcing rules he doesn't like (and SpaceX keeps breaking)

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I'm getting really sick of the "conventional wisdom" that government is inefficient and wasteful when compared to private industry. Medicare for example can provide more healthcare per dollar than any private insurer despite subsidizing that industry.

Profit and marketing are inefficiencies because they add cost but no value.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Yep, exactly. Also, look at how the USPS works.

Republican chuds: "Big Guvmit can't do anything right, it's the worst, they are hurting my freedom, argle bargle!"

Also Republican chuds: "Back the blue (unless they break up a terrorist action called in by our former failed president) and our military is the bestest and shiniest in the whole wide WURLD!"

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

Government is inefficient if you elect people who believe it is and set out to prove it.

People who say "run things like a business" don't know shit. Every job I've worked at has had tremendous waste, but no one was looking closely because it's private.

Like, right wing nut jobs would lose their shit if they learned a government office was buying fresh fruits for workers but most of it was going bad and being thrown out. But that happened every day for a while.

There's also been a lot of "why is this machine still running? How much are we paying AWS for this??"

There's also been a lot of "we don't need to do accessibility on our website because most of our customers don't care, and no one's making us ".

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

I look forward to seeing Musk booted from this country.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago

And the whole reason the department is being created is because it would be called DOGE

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

Yet another reason not to vote for Diaper Don I guess

load more comments
view more: next ›