this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
587 points (96.1% liked)

News

29511 readers
2117 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Vice presidential candidates JD Vance and Tim Walz are set to debate this Tuesday. Ahead of the Oct. 1 event, the broadcaster announced that moderators Norah O’Donnell and Margaret Brennan will not fact-check either candidate — Walz and Vance will be responsible for fact-checking one another. The news prompted political scientist Norman Ornstein to lament that though CBS was once “the gold standard for television news,” both “those days and their standards are long gone.”

Ornstein isn’t the only voice objecting to CBS’ announcement, with the condemnation of their choice widespread on social media after CNN previously declined to fact-check candidates during the debate between Joe Biden and Donald Trump earlier this year, followed by ABC opting to include brief fact-checks from moderators in the presidential debate between Trump and Kamala Harris.

According to CBS News’ editorial standards, the moderators are there to facilitate the conversation/debate between the candidates, as well as enforce the debate’s rules. However, they leave the responsibility to the candidates when it comes to fact-checking as part of the broadcast. CBS does plan to offer its own form of live fact-checking — but it will be online, rather than directly from the moderators, via its CBS News Confirmed Unit journalists in an online blog.

(page 2) 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 40 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I refuse to upvote any post woth the word "slammed" in the title

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago

Vance will be fact checked way more.

[–] [email protected] 103 points 7 months ago

So they're just going to let Vance fearmonger the country into a race war.

Cool. Cool cool cool.

[–] [email protected] 107 points 7 months ago (1 children)

CBS does plan to offer its own form of live fact-checking — but it will be online, rather than directly from the moderators, via its CBS News Confirmed Unit journalists in an online blog.

So the attention of the viewer is divided or they don't even know that there is an online live fact check.

Sounds more than fishy

[–] [email protected] 30 points 7 months ago (3 children)

I vote for big true/false gauge behind them both. The needle swings as the speaker speaks. Maybe a flashing red light for insane lies and green for absolute truth.

But they would need real fact checkers voting on the truthfulness in real time to make it work.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

This is actually a great compromise if they don't wanna fact check em on air. Have the meter and the link on screen if anyone wants to go online to read the fact check.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)

"Uh, well, I, uh ... the question is-is vague. You don't say what kind of couch, whether anyone is watching or, uh... At any rate, I certainly wouldn't fuck the couch!"

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago

The best thing about this joke is how protesting will make him sound so much more guilty of it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 7 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago

To slams, you say?

[–] [email protected] 259 points 7 months ago (3 children)

At this point, refusing to fact-check a debate is just a tacit admission that you want to help the GOP. After all, JD Vance is on record saying he has no problem lying and making up things if he thinks it's politically advantageous. Tim Walz shouldn't have to cut into his time correcting the lies of an established liar. Why have journalists involved at all? Seems like it'd be cheaper to hire some bozo off the street to read the questions and only enforce time limits on the Democrat. You don't need Norah O’Donnell and Margaret Brennan to accomplish that.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 98 points 7 months ago (1 children)

He says she says. What a way to run a debate. Terrible idea!

[–] [email protected] 66 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This is a requirement of modern right-populist politics. They won't play defense, so they just say crap and you're always chasing the latest nonsense and never get to make a point.

Of course the counter to this is for Walz to make this a non-stop couch-fucking roast from minute one. I'm talking opening statement is about upholstery, fabric texture, visualize choices for lubricant and material combos. Just go all in on the furniture abuse right away.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago (1 children)

<Walks walks onto stage and goes to shake Vance's hand> "Hey, how was the tour of Ashely Furniture? Sorry I couldn't join you... Did you find any attractive couches?"

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

“‘Test’ any out?”

[–] [email protected] 29 points 7 months ago (7 children)

Hook each VP candidate nuts to a car battery and every time they lie hit them with the full voltage.

Simple as.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (3 children)

too low voltage, recommend 10 batteries in series

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (2 children)

That would increase voltage?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That's how batteries in series work.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 190 points 7 months ago (6 children)

I feel like Walz will be able to call Vance on whatever bullshit he's peddling... but not having a neutral fact checker is a terrible idea.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Vance can spew out so much BS that Walz won't be able to make any points of his own.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago

Time concerns aside, this will just make GOP say "they have their own idea of truth". Which is correct but the causality is vice versa.

[–] [email protected] 102 points 7 months ago

And also Walz doesn't need to be wasting all of his allotted time fact checking an admitted liar. Not a ton of actual "News" in this article, but several of the referenced comments were funny/made good points like that.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago

Come on and slam! And welcome to the jam!

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›