this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

El Chisme

442 readers
32 users here now

Place for posting about the dumb shit public figures say.

Rules:

Rule 1: The subject of a post must be a public person.

Rule 2: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 3: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 4: No sectarianism.

Rule 5: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 6: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 7: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 8: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Picture is edited lol, here is the original

Why Won’t Zohran Mamdani Denounce a Dangerous Slogan?

Zohran Mamdani’s opponents paint him as a dangerous radical. The young, socialistic candidate for New York City mayor wishes to dispel that perception—in some ways. Last week, he appeared on a podcast with The Bulwark’s Tim Miller, a former Republican and the sort of moderate Mamdani knows he needs to win over, or at least neutralize, if he is to carry this week’s Democratic primary. As Miller presented a litany of concerns about Mamdani’s plans to freeze stabilized-housing rent, establish city-run groceries, and other offenses against Econ 101, the candidate expressed a willingness to hinge his policies on outcomes and abandon his plans if they failed.

"Dangerous radical" and its rent freeze and city-run stores, lol

But when Miller asked Mamdani about the pro-Palestine slogan “Globalize the intifada,” the candidate’s pragmatism and intellectual humility evaporated. “To me, ultimately, what I hear in so many is a desperate desire for equality and equal rights in standing up for Palestinian human rights,” he said.

Mamdani insisted to Miller, evasively, that he won’t repudiate globalizing the intifada because, as he put it, “the role of the mayor is not to police language.” Yet there’s no rule in politics that says a mayor or a candidate can’t criticize political rhetoric. Nor has Mamdani bound himself to such a prohibition: He has policed the terminology of his opponents by, for instance, complaining that he has faced “dehumanizing language” as a Muslim candidate for office.

"why doesnt the scary muslim share my foreign policy views but gets angry when im racist to him??"

top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

he then delved into the semantics of intifada, citing the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum’s use of the word as the translation of “uprising” in an Arabic version of an article the museum published about the Warsaw Ghetto. This comparison, to a Jewish armed rebellion against the Nazis, hardly dispels concern about the incendiary implications of the slogan. If the intifada is akin to the ghetto uprising, then it is a call for violence.

he-admit-it

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

coming out against the Warsaw ghetto uprising to own the.. own the..

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

The dangerous slogan in question is "Israel has a right to exist".

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

What's up with that photo? Us this a cutscene from Command and Conquer? Dope

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

Jonathan mothercucking chait I forgot this two trick pony existed.

Fuck. My day is now worse for knowing that.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

White liberals need to centre their feelings in everything, even if they're being massive fascists in the process. I'm literally begging the in power group to give a fuck about the marginalised.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

It's always sicko-wistful with these guys, I wish this random do-(relatively)-nothing politician was the cool guy these fearmongers actually claimed he is.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

nothing is subtle anymore

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

Ah yes, The "it is possible to kill children legally" Atlantic classic

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

Now it’s our turn.

“Lol, look at the LAMe-stream media’s MAMDANI DERANGEMENT SYNDROME! Anything to spin the narrative that brown man bad, am I right?”

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

Jonathan Shite

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Chapo provided me with a certain type of media literacy, exclusively for oped pieces

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

They're also pretty helpful with chud fiction writing like with pureflix or True Allegiance

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

lol, I'll give Mr. Chait a hint: it rhymes with "you're a racist, Islamophobic piece of shit trying to scare people into voting against their interests for your capitalist owners and get a sex pest elected Mayor of NYC"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

Nothing like seeing the mass scratching of some liberals.

They’re all impotent weaklings and I cannot wait to use them for “anti-woke cringe compilation” and undo more than a decade of brainrot.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Now post the same header but with a picture of Netanyahu and see how long your post stays up.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Murdering children is a qualitative difference, chud

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I posted a couple memes depicting the "child murderer" as the devil and both times it was taken down by the moderators here who are obviously gate keeping for the crimes against humanity.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

The post you made on Lemmy.ml ? This is not the same instance

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

You mean the Polish man from Jersey?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I would like to see a photo of Netanyahu get lit up, yes.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

They're lost.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)

What about that photo is unflattering? We’ve watched Biden and trump and Feinstein and Pelosi visibly melting for years and that’s not unflattering or scary, apparently. Is it literally just that he is a kinda muslim looking guy? Fuck me

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

To give them way, way more credit than they deserve, that kind of lighting is 100% used to make characters look sinister in tv/movies.

But yes it is also mostly just islamophobia.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They caught him doing a Kubrick face and that's how you know he's evil

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I thought it was more the old-timey vampire movie up the nose type lighting.