this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
786 points (98.2% liked)

politics

18894 readers
3049 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Billie Eilish is the latest high-profile entertainer to back Vice President Harris’s White House bid, urging her fans to “vote like your life depends on it.”

“We are voting for Kamala Harris and Tim Walz because they are fighting to protect our reproductive freedom, our planet and our democracy,” Eilish said in a video posted on social media on Tuesday.

“We can’t let extremists control our lives, our freedoms and our future,” Eilish’s brother and longtime collaborator, Finneas O’Connell, said in the message shared with the “Lunch” singer’s more than 7 million followers on X.

“The choice is clear,” the post said.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

It's a real death and death situation

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Don't vote like your life depends on it, vote because your way of life depends on it.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Logically yeah, the latter statement implies former

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Ah so my CS logic courses are useful for something. Neat!

[–] [email protected] 68 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

For women ~~of childbearing age~~? It DOES.

ftfy

[–] [email protected] 33 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Does that make Trump the bad guy?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

do do do do do do do do

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I can't remember a time before the Republicunts started obsessing over him that anyone on the planet didn't hate him. It's insane seeing one of the most infamous people alive get so many dick riders.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There was a period of blissful ignorance circa 2006 where the only thing I knew about him was that he was rich and starred in the apprentice. Then a black man became president and the world hasn't been free of his stench ever since.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 days ago

You do know there's a 1980s video of Trump talking about becoming the President of the United States, so it wasn't "a black man becoming president" that made him decide to run...just sayin'.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

These endorsements are important not necessarily because of who is doing them, but for the constant wave of reminders that are more high profile than usual political messages. I think the biggest fight is against complacency as we start seeing the "sweeping poll numbers" from the media near the end. Vote regardless of who you're told is winning, it won't matter until the votes are counted.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

I'm not holding my breath but hopefully it increases youth turnout of women. Which is a group that is much more progressive than young men, but both have poor turnout compared to older people.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I expect at least half the reason she publicly endorsed Harris was to seriously piss Trump and his followers off. That seems like something she'd really enjoy.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

Probably thinks Billie is a dude like the thought that guy Nicky was a girl

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago

If you can do a good thing for women's rights and simultaneously piss off terrible people, well, that's just a win-win situation.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

Yes...yes we do

load more comments
view more: next ›