this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2024

160 points (76.5% liked)

politics

18883 readers

3537 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

160

Liberals Are Not Laughing About Jon Stewart's Jabs at Joe Biden (www.rollingstone.com)

submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

164 comments fedilink hide all child comments

He also said that the danger posed by another Trump term doesn’t excuse Biden from scrutiny but “actually makes him more subject to scrutiny.”

To leftists and progressives fed up with Biden, particularly his commitment to Israel as it continues to bomb civilians in Gaza, the assessment was not just fair — it was obvious. But more centrist Democrats, including those most likely to have appended “Blue Wave” and “Resistance” labels to their social media accounts in the Trump years, were appalled at what they saw as a betrayal by one of their own.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

I actually think it would have been damaging to pretend that Biden is perfect. People who can be convinced to vote one way or another aren't blind to the flaws of the current administration, pretending that everything is rosy will switch them off and they'll stay home.

Providing honest criticism, where warranted, of both sides and acknowledging the very real concerns around Biden is more likely to keep people engaged and informed. Despite how flawed Biden is, any sane, informed voter chooses him over Trump every time.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago

Our candidate is so far from what voters want that we run articles about how great the economy is and how much awesome shit he got through to try to convince voters because the alternative is a nightmare. Someone just came in and said the things that we've been deliberately ignoring. Oh noez! DAMAGE CONTROL. DAMAGE CONTROL. DAMAGE CONTROL.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

He wasn't wrong to say those things, but it was really scary watching it.

Thinking "it's ethical that he do this, but what will it cost us?"

How many votes? How many fractions of a % of the total vote did this push away from Biden?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If the candidate is so weak that a TV show comedy segment can take votes away...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

The "not a nazi" platform is strong.

But is it strong enough?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

Stop trying to make a story of this.

The old adage says "progressives need to fall in love; conservatives need to fall in line."

It means conservatives and their focus on loyalty means they neither express or accept any criticism of their party's leadership. Progressives, though, always exist in that sea of doubt and always need to be convinced of the validity of their candidate because they're always reassessing.

TL;DR -- this outrage over negative comments is a little too fanboy, a little too accepting for actual progressives. It's not their way. This outrage that is being reported means there's more conservatives learning how to be progressive and need some help. Let them in the idea that doubt is okay and not to be angry about the disloyalty.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 7 months ago (1 children)

ONE-TIME FANS WHO perhaps remember comedian Jon Stewart only taking satirical swipes at conservatives while host of The Daily Show

Not a good look for an article to start with such a hot take. Anyone who thought Stewart never took aim at Democrats couldn't have been a fan because they must have never watched his fucking show.

[+] [email protected] -17 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Time and place, Jon...

We're on the cusp of an actual fascist uprising in America, let's not disparage the guy standing in the way of that, yeah?

[–] [email protected] -5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

No we're not. We are just on the cusp of four shitty years. People are overreacting to a demented old man. There's a long list of things the crazy fucker wants to do, and an extremely short list of things he will actually be able to do.

The media silos are feeding everyone panic pablum with a chaser of hysteria pills. We've had bad presidents before and everyone lived through them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's really easy to call alarmism - it means nobody has to do anything about the problem and no one is to blame. We've got politicians quoting Mien Kampf almost verbatim, but sure, it's just an overreaction 🙄

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

No it means exactly what the definition for alarmism says. You can choose to believe "it means nobody has to do anything about the problem and no one is to blame".

And quoting Mein Kampf only means that the politician in question is either mentally disturbed or dog whistling.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Life must be nice with blinders on, buddy... 🙄

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

3 steps toward fascism instead of 5 isn't standing in the way.

Ooh save us from the guy who wants to sidestep congress to back genocide, guy who sidesteps congress to back genocide!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

I'd rather vote for the liberal comedian, tbh.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

And they all started chanting "four more years" from their couches to drown out any discontentment with Biden.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Not all of us, bud.

I voted for Biden and shall again, because the alternative is despicable, corrupt, treasonous, rapey, evil, and just fuckin' wrong, and so is their candidate.

The Dems don't have another candidate that has any chance of beating Pumpkin Tits, because the Dems still believe in time-outs instead of spankings, politically, and they don't want their rich donors to clutch their pearls.

(If the Dems' balls were ever to descend, that might be a different story, but here we are. )

Jab away, Jon.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 7 months ago (1 children)

He was right on all points.

But people obviously missed the point he made about the choice is still between a old Biden or old lunatic. So it's not some 50/50 both sides bullshit

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

in a way, I wonder if JS was egging the mainstream media on to highlight the difference themselves, to distinguish a key difference - one's an imperfect solution, the other is a deranged tyrant criminal. Yeah, do the math.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago

The show was really funny. This post was a good excuse to watch the monologue again. Looking forward to next Monday's show.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Who wasn't laughing? It was hilarious. Jon Stewart's points were spot on all around.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 7 months ago

Who wasn't laughing?

People who require uncritical support of their candidate.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

As a Canadian, I was laughing my ass off

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago

That episode was scathing and I love it.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago

Guess I'm not a liberal. The man is genius.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 7 months ago

If you didn't laugh at Stewart's criticism, you're no better than a Bill Maher or new york times liberal.

load more comments