this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2024
798 points (98.4% liked)

politics

18852 readers
4125 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

It wouldn't be fair to have your felony conviction negatively impact your opportunities. This is how justice works right?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Shouldn't being a convicted felon affect one's candidacy?

Should the US government also pay candidates to have aesthetic surgeries? Being ugly might affect their candidacy!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

And when he's elected, he'll change the law in his favour. I know, he can't do everything he wishes, but he could probably make it better for himself. VOTE!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

He wasn't wrong when he said it was rigged.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 week ago

Aren't we showing bias by giving criminals extra time because they decided to run a bullshit political campaign to subvert the law

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago

"My name is Stabby McKiller! Yes, I clearly stabbed four people in that home, and yes, I was convicted! BUT, I am also running for president! For total fairness, I demand my sentencing be delayed, so my sentence does not sway voter opinion!"

What fucking bullshit. THIS is bias.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

Seems like a fuck ton of bias to me. What a joke.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Showing bias by claiming its an effort to not show bias is fucking insanity.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

Wait till after election. -If Harris wins they claim she's locking up her opponent so he can't investigate the votes being wrong -If Trump wins they riot if Trump gets sentenced on anything claiming they are trying to lock him up because he won.

His election has and should have nothing to do with it.

They are begging for riots it seems

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 week ago

In an effort to not serve justice, in other words.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

How dumb is the judge to just now figure out that, oh, there's a presidential election in 2 months ... This has been an issue since the conviction.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago

Yeah sorry, you cant send me to prison for anything cause it effects my chance at my job. Please wait till my job interview is over, thanks.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Narrator: This showed bias.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago

In an effort to not show bias, we are giving incredible bias to Trump that no one else would get.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 week ago

That is showing bias.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 week ago

"Justice delayed is justice denied"

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Nope, it’s smart. Leaving sentencing until after the election also keeps the Supreme Court out of it before the election. You can bet your boots they would have fast-tracked any appeal and nullified the sentence somehow before the election.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Your comment makes me a little less angry

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 week ago (3 children)

If trump gets elected he’ll just pardon himself or whatever machinations transpire where he won’t be sentenced at all.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

He can’t do that. These are state crimes.

He has no authority to pardon non-federal crimes.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Buddy. Pal. He tried a violent overthrow of the US government. If he wins, that's GG. He just will until/unless the military coup him.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

He can’t pardon them, but he can probably just ignore whatever punishment is given and he’ll say he has presidential immunity (regardless of whether it fits, that’s the idea he’ll have). Then, if he becomes a sitting president, nobody will actually do anything to enforce the judgement against him and it’ll just be ignored, making presidential immunity to even state crimes a practical reality, even if it’s not a legal reality.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

True. But that is based in logic and the assumption that laws follow strict "rules" and well...

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

If he was sentenced before the election the Supreme Court nullifies it and you have the same result. Do all that you can to make sure he doesn’t get elected.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Acceptance of a pardon also means an admission of guilt. Trump has never guilty to anything, so he’ll be in a tight spot.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

He will just say how can I be guilty of sth I got pardoned for? Some true Trump logic at work.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

Not at all. He's been charged and found guilty before and it has made no difference because there's never been real consequences.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 week ago (3 children)

That’s bullshit. Sentence the asshole now. He’ll flee the country otherwise

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Eh, Putin can have his dog back. Just make sure he doesn't come back.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

If he wants to flee the country I'll buy him a 1-way ticket right now.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

As long as he's gone...

load more comments
view more: next ›