this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2024
378 points (96.1% liked)

Today I Learned

17669 readers
342 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Throughout the 19th century, news reports and medical journal articles almost always use the plant's formal name, cannabis. Numerous accounts say that "marijuana" came into popular usage in the U.S. in the early 20th century because anti-cannabis factions wanted to underscore the drug's "Mexican-ness." It was meant to play off of anti-immigrant sentiments.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Jokes on them, they could’ve just called it Kush to acknowledge its Himalayanness. Americans definitely would’ve understood that

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Hooold up, wait a minute, let me put some kush up in it...

[–] [email protected] 46 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Sticky icky

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Devil's lettuce is my favoruite

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's not racist, though, and this topic is about racist terms for cannabis.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Er, black devil's lettuce?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

Mine has always been "The Whacky Tobacky"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Electric lettuce is not bad ether.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

What happened to "Mary-Jane"? Wasn't that in use for some time?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Early 20th century here gets discounted because of the zero century so that's 1900 through say 1930. Marijuana and Mary Jane both used at the same time it's older than you're thinking when you read the article

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

There's still some Mary Jane erasure going on here.

And it seems like nobody is using mary jane any more. There's got to be a reason for that.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Just call it grass. It’s got history and style…

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I feel like it's more racist to start calling it cannabis once it's legal.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

I don't think it's more racist, but I definitely don't like the idea that it was called marijuana to create a negative connotation with Latin Americans, but now that public opinion is coming around on it, people no longer want to associate it with the Latin American name.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Can you explain your logic?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

We called it marijuana before it was legal. Marijuana is a term that's obviously linked to Latin communities. So while it's illegal, we're OK with calling it something that's linked to a community, BUT once it's legal, suddenly we're trying to erase that connection. Like it's too good for that community anymore. It would be less racist to continue calling it marijuana WHILE recognizing the historical racism and celebrating the culture that ensured the plant was still here when it was legalized. Ignoring that contribution is like appropriation. Erasing the Latin influences in marijuana culture once the plant is legal isn't anti racist.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

I like this take but it relies on a critical analysis that isn't going to occur to most people. Most people aren't even aware up the word's racist origins.

I think calling it cannabis helps distance it from it's illegal past. There's a lot of more conservative people out there that still think of "marijuana" as something dangerous and criminal that is used by disreputable people. I think calling it "canabis" will help shed that negative connotation.

For the record, I call it "weed."

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Yup. Marijuana has always had widespread use by those from formerly Spanish-colonised cultures which are Hispanics and Filipinos.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Filipinos!? Are you sure about that? My wife is from these and is horrified at the mere suggestion of it. She doesn't talk shit about people doing it, but having it around is a hard NO for her. She's even leery about me getting mack on medical.

Speaking broadly, Asians have a hard line stance against drugs, figured that was her thing. Maybe she's just worried about being an immigrant on the wrong side of the law?

And yes, they're the Mexicans of Asia.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

I mean historically Filipinos who migrated to the United States were also one of the wide users of marijuana along with Hispanics. And among those communities, the cannabis/marijuana did not have had any negative connotation until the war on drugs.

load more comments
view more: next ›