this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2024
228 points (70.6% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

6172 readers
93 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Queen the band sucks. I don't get why anyone likes them. Aside from Bohemian Rhapsody, their songs are bland and fall short. Their rock is dry. And the opera-style singing is cringe. Examples:

Another One Bites the Dust

  • Catchy bass line, fun to direct at an opponent, CORNY AF. The song is about people being killed, but sounds like a funky Michael Jackson song with an Opera singer.

We Will Rock You

  • Good solo, repetitive and annoying simple beat. Boom-boom-ch. So lame.

We Are the Champions

  • Such a self-aggrandizing and braggy song. "No time for losers"? Okay, Donald Trump.

Bicycle Race

  • I don't even have to say anything about this one. Everyone knows how corny this song sounds.

Somebody to Love

  • Touching topic, cheesy lyrics and even cheesier choir-like singing. It's cringe.

I am happy for the band and their success. I admire Freddie Mercury's unapologetic flamboyance. The dude kept it real. But, I just can't like the music.

I'm sorry if I've offended anyone. I understand we all have different taste and respect everyone's freedom to like and enjoy what they want. I'm not trying to insult anyone for their taste, but merely expressing my own in a somewhat humorous attempt.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Do you recognize their talent though? Because if you don't, then this is more of an issue with your musical knowledge and lack of appreciation than with the music. That said, their music is 50 years old now, and music has changed and progressed a lot since then. Much of that progress is due to groundbreaking artists such as Queen. Bands in the 60's and 70's were pioneering completely new sounds that would change the face of music forever. Many modern songs are derivative of Queen's music. It's understandable that you don't appreciate it like someone older would, because you've grown up listening to music that was a natural progression from this music. But in their era, they were something entirely new, fresh, daring, and awesome. Also, Freddy had one of the best voices in the history of rock and roll. I'd say he really only has 2 peers, Robert Plant, and Steve Perry.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

thats gonna be a stick figure amongst their group of friends thumbs-upping you from a distance and then returning to their conversation from me, dawg

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

it's true that shit is fucking garbage

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I wish some people that liked Queen and these styles of music would realize they are not immune from the subjectiveness of music tastes. It's one of the bigger 'bubbles', if not the biggest, but certainly not the only one or I'd argue, the majority.

I like my choice of music to the point where most pieces invoke more joy and emotion to me than Bohemian Rhapsody, and I find it somewhat strange that even so long after it was released it still remains on top. That's completely different from what I like, where a new song can pretty much take the top spot at any time if it's good enough. If it's the same song every time, that's something I wouldn't consider a healthy level of innovation for a genre, but rather a sign that it has reached it's peak and has became seemingly permanently stale. At that point it feels to me that deep nostalgia keeps it in place, rather than it actually being the best current music has to offer.

There's nothing wrong with that though, nostalgia is a valid reason to like a song. But often some people that like that kind of music become militantly angry if you point that out. And then cite popularity contests that only people that like that kind of music participate in, to somehow say that everyone likes their music. And that in turn makes those contests seem kind of disingenuous since they claim they are finding the best music of all time. It's self selecting, because anyone that can't boost their specific music to the top because their genre still has healthy levels of competition and can't produce one piece that everyone agrees on, simply won't bother.

Just my two cents to an unpopular opinion. Again I don't mind people liking Queen's music, but I've had people literally be offended because I didn't want to listen to a group of men scream "Mama mia" in an attempt to burst my ear drums because they want the volume to be at 300% when that part starts, only to then also sing along for another volume boost. Anyone else doing that with their music would be told to mind their own business and keep the volume reasonable. It's the double standard and the denial of contrary opinions that I don't like. You can't expect everyone to like your music.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I agree with you 100%, every sentence, and now I don't know whether I should up- or downvote you

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

thank youuuu 🙌

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Not every song needs to be good, and the fact that you even know the bad ones says something.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The bad songs listed are their greatest hits though

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

They always were a bit of a meme band, and the charts exaggerate that somewhat. Even Crazy Frog had a number one hit, and absolutely nobody could listen to that in 2024 and think it was good.

They're not really a lot different to many other artists. Some middling songs mixed in with some bangers. And they knew how to put on a show. That Live Aid gig was fucking iconic. None of the 72,000 people standing in Wembley stadium that day were thinking "these lyrics are cringe".

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

How could you say that when they've composed classic, heartfelt lyrics like these?

I want to ride my bicycle, I want to ride my bike!!!!!!!

Bicycle, bicycle!!!!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Makes more sense in an era when you werent allowed to be gay/queer and also be respected in your field.

You do know bicycle is a thinly veiled code for being bisexual right?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I didn't, but the song and lyrics still aren't much improved with that knowledge.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

How arent they improved by that? You dont have to enjoy them any more, but the lyrics are undeniably improved by knowing what non-literal message they are saying.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It isn't for me. It's my opinion. It's kinda like how knowing the back story for "don't drink the water" by Dave Matthews Band does nothing to make the song listenable to me.

A good concept doesn't always translate into a great song.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I feel like you misunderstood me so let me try to elaborate to fix that. My apologies.

You are making definitive statements, instead of framing your statements as opinions.

It might not improve your enjoyment of the songs, but they are objectively better lyrics by having more meanings.

Improvement doesnt need to be enjoyable. In the same way popular does not equal quality.

Im not trying to convince you to like the song anymore. Im pointing out that you misrepresented them with your comment and then doubled down on it. Its fine im not upset or trying to convince you to listen to the song more, im merely trying to explain, and at this point for anyone else reading this threads discussion.

Lyrics arent always meant to be deep thought provoking amazing literature, but serve the theme mood or tone of a project. You could say the same about dialogue if we wanted to broaden the scope of this discussion. Thats not a suggestion, just framing my purpose.

I hope this helps to explain what I was saying, and if it doesnt we will simply have to hash it out, or agree to disagree. Im fine with either outcome

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Im pointing out that you misrepresented them with your comment and then doubled down on it.

In what way did I "misrepresent" them?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

I don't understand how someone can dislike the choir singing and cheesy, campy, flamboyance of a bunch of different Queen songs, but thinks it's ok in Bohemian Rhapsody. Like, cheesy, campy, flamboyance is a staple of Queen's style. It's in all of their songs

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The Beatles were also repetitive, dry, corny and cringe but I think you'd have a hard time making the argument that they suck because of that.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

No, no. I'd listen to that argument

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I see myself as someone who likes Queen's songs. Sometimes I just put on a Queen song and enjoy it.

But every time I listen to my playlist on shuffle, I find myself skipping Queen the most. Always hoping the next one will be AC/DC.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Not sure if this is a serious comment but in case it is, you may want to check out Goodbye June

https://open.spotify.com/track/63tV7Ajy1yqmHAv5w4TR8s?si=voRqzlASTPendWIbIgSwkw

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

I feel like those arguments are pretty subjective. If you live by them, you cant listen to anything repetitive, corny, grandiose, dramatic and cheesy.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Bruddah... 🤜🤛 Respect.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

thank youuuuu!! 🤜🤛

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

"Sucks" is entirely subjective when applied to musical taste, I applaud your attempt for engagement. I do believe that Queen is overhyped to hell and back but other than that, big meh, lots of people don't like the same music I do, so that is completely normal.

Mild take.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

This just looks like a 14 year old trying to shit on older music to sound cool. I get it's bait and all, but it was kinda boring, standard internet vapor.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago

The trump reference really sank it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

Agreed. Trolling in this post is mid.

load more comments
view more: next ›