this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
497 points (95.6% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2718 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump has watched a video clip of the attempt on his life at a Pennsylvania rally “over and over again,” leading to fears that he may be suffering from PTSD, according to a report.

The former president has viewed the “seven-second” clip, in which his right ear was grazed with a bullet, multiple times – an act which has not helped a reported mental spiral brought on by Joe Biden’s decision to drop out of the 2024 race.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 52 points 3 months ago (7 children)

Can someone spread a credible-sounding rumour that due to this shooting Trump is considering a ban on guns?

It would be the death of MAGA, as they internally wrestle their love of guns for their fanatic support of Trump.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago (2 children)

he's already attempted to ban bump stocks, which is more of an attempt than biden

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Man that looks like a pretty intact ear to me…

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 months ago (7 children)

5.56mm is a very tiny bullet. The damage would come from traveling very fast, which is very bad when it hits a fleshy mass.

Thankfully (for Trump and perhaps for America not turning him into a MAGA martyr) the ear isn't very fleshy so the bullet didn't impart much energy. He certainly had plastic surgery to fix the tiny hole.

Personally, I much prefer to watch Trump deflate and be crushed under the support of Harris and Walz.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 months ago

This is how the rest of us feel about footage from January 6.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 months ago

Love that for him

[–] [email protected] 35 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Well maybe he should get therapy...

...

... HAHAHAHA sorry, I couldn't hold it back any more. No he'll do exactly what you think he'll do - let it fester into an (additional) mental illness.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Maybe his ear just did that.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Maybe he will campaign for gun control then

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

I'm sure he's up for pissing off all the ones that love showing off their guns.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 3 months ago

Good, fuck him. He is a self-serving narcissist piece of shit. Too bad this didn't happen 30 years ago where he could have done a 180 and not turned into the waste of air he is today.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Agreed. That bullet never touched him. The real victim's blood spatter is what we saw on his cheek. The man who was actually shot was just feet behind Trump, within range of that small spatter from a high velocity projectile.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Guys... the picture is right there.

If it was splatter from the man in the crowd, there would have been a wider distribution of smaller globules.

I've seen enough pink mist on the internet, man...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think he was absolutely grazed by the bullet, but it is still hilarious to me that the FBI put out a whole statement saying they won't confirm it was a real hit. I think the dude is absolutely headstrong enough to keep campaigning after something like that. It can't have had no effect at all.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Someone on lemmy said that it was probably the shockwave from the bullet rather than the bullet itself which hit him. Pretty sure I also saw something about an FBI statement which seemed to later corroborate that. Ultimately, its not super important. He was shot at, lightly injured, and now he's spiraling for one reason or another

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 158 points 3 months ago (1 children)

May his suffering be proportional to that which he's caused.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There's no conceivable way on Earth he could sustain that much pain before dying.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 months ago (2 children)

That's a testable hypothesis.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

I do think its a worthy experiment

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Only testable once.

But I guess we could substitute those who voted to not impeach/remove him from office and those who voted to overturn Roe for additional data.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

I mean we can't just not peer review. Drawing conclusions from a single study?! That's crazy!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 84 points 3 months ago

Guy with no empathy seeks some, finds none.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›