NikkiDimes

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I meaaan, there is no pandemic in 2024. We fucked the whole thing up and it's just a regular ol' endemic disease killing people every year that could have been prevented. Weeeeee!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

And keeping with their initial example, the US also has a lot of school shootings. Doesn't mean schools are dangerous.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

That's still civil. I think this is just a case of fraud plain and simple.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 15 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I guess you missed the if. The topic is literally regarding monetary related punishments. That does even remotely imply forgoing anything else.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Just because you scored high doesn't mean they did. They are recruiters, after all.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Y'all realize what you're describing is just a poor tax, right? Anyone with significantly higher income over base income would...just break the law anyway.

If we're talking using money to deter crimes, it needs to be a sliding scale. You're a millionaire and got a speeding ticket? That'll be $50,000.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

It is! Just be aware that it won't always be right. It's good to verify things with additional sources (as with anything, really).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I mean...

私と日本語で会話したいか 😅

At the end of the day, I feel like it's how you use the tool. "if you’re just trying to work through a bunch of problems so you can stop working through a bunch of problems, it ain’t gonna help you." How do you think a bunch of kids using this are going to be using it when it comes to school work that they're required to finish, but not likely actually interested in?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If it is on the open internet and visible to anyone with a web browser and you have an adblocker like most people, you are not paying to support that work. That's what it was trained on.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

I personally use it's answers as a jumping off point to do my own research, or I ask it for sources directly about things and check those out. I frequently use LLMs for learning about topics, but definitely don't take anything they say at face value.

For a personal example, I use ChatGPT as my personal Japanese tutor. I use it discuss and break down nuances of various words or sayings, names of certain conjugation forms etc. etc., and it is absolutely not 100% correct, but I can now take the names of things that it gives me in native Japanese that I never would have known and look them up using other resources. Either it's correct and I find confirming information, or it's wrong and I can research further independently or ask it follow up questions. It's certainly not as good as a human native speaker, but for $20 a month and as someone who likes enjoys doing their own research, I fucking love it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

I think this works great if the student is interested in the subject, but if you're just trying to work through a bunch of problems so you can stop working through a bunch of problems, it ain't gonna help you.

I have personally learned so much from LLMs (although you can't really take anything at face value and have to look things up independently, but it gives you a great starting place), but it comes from a genuine interest in the questions I'm asking and things I dig at.

view more: next ›