this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024
189 points (99.5% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35809 readers
1065 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

or just a 'poof'?

(page 2) 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 months ago (10 children)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 83 points 3 months ago (2 children)

it would be absolutely immensely catastrophic from the point of view of the planet ... but for us and for the Sun, it would be nothing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 65 points 3 months ago

Are you planning something?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

don’t open this if you don’t want part of the three body problem series spoiledIsn’t that the core element of one of the scorched earth fallback plans one of the wallfacers came up with? I thought it was supposed to have been roughly scientifically viable…? Or am I completely misremembering?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 61 points 3 months ago (5 children)

For a start, the planet wouldn't actually collide with the sun on one piece - once the planet crosses the Roche limit it will break apart

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago

if it "ran straight", it wouldn't have tangential speed, only radial.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

All of the mass would still hit the sun, though.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, but single large mass hitting in one place vs stuff spread out vs planet forming a ring and deorbiting over months/years would affect the outcome

Practically, I'd think there wouldn't be a huge effect beyond some CMEs - the mass of the earth is a rounding error compared to the sun - but I'm not a cosmologist

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

CME = coronal mass ejection

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I tend to agree, but I also am not a cosmologist.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago

I agree, and I once dated a cosmetologist.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

Would its impact create a solar flare? And if that flare was hurtling towards Earth, would it be more devastating than other solar storms we normally see?

[–] [email protected] 115 points 3 months ago (10 children)

I mean the sun is pretty heckin huge

It would a situation of, "who threw that pebble?"

[–] [email protected] 58 points 3 months ago

You can't fool me with that label of "diameter", I know that's actually a trench with an exhaust port that if successfully fired into will cause a cascading failure

[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago (7 children)

Now I'm imagining the type of event that could cause a planet to move at such a significant percent of c that you could disrupt the sun with it. I don't think we're gonna get a planet moving that fast. I think we'd be limited to stellar core remnants to get that kick in velocity.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's not how relativity works. Moving quickly relative to what? The planet might be moving slow relative to the local objects where it began its movement, but the local objects at it's origination point were also moving at some speed, and the group of objects that the local group was in were also moving at some speed, etc etc. And likewise our sun isn't stationary, it's also moving relative to everything else, so you could just as easily say the planet is stationary but our sun was moving very quickly toward the stationary planet. There is no thing as an absolute slow/fast when you're talking about bodies in space. There are tons of ways that a planet sized object could have a fraction-of-c speed relative to our sun.

And there are "rogue planets" out there. They aren't held into any orbital system, they're just flying free in empty space. So that part is true as well. It would be very unlikely that some of them AREN'T moving extremely quickly relative to the sun.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rogue_planet

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I would expect that the planets gravity while heading into the sun from outside the solar system would greatly disturb the existing planets and probably throw some of them into new orbits if not out of the solar system entirely.

New fear unlocked.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Big flare, seismic waves propagating on the surface, and POOF.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›