this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024
561 points (99.6% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4400 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

JD Vance has real "rejected from art school" vibes. Though I somehow suspect his villain origin story is even stupider than that.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

I don't understand, did he write multiple forwards to Project 2025 books? Why do we keep getting random headlines to single lines that he wrote for one piece?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

He looks, and kinda sounds, like Gary from Your Pretty Face is Going to Hell.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Nah, he's fat bizarro Bill Hader.

Though honestly my wish is that Martin Short plays him on SNL. Only because Steve Martin is the obvious choice for Waltz and I really think Short could capture the idea that JD doesn't even deserve a credible stand in, only off the wall mockery.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Suffering is better together.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why are there quotation marks around only the word “wolves”? Is that the only word from the headline he actually said?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Maybe the rest is paraphrased for brevity, or maybe the author felt that this was the least believable part and opted to emphasise that he used that exact word.

Or maybe it's some weird rule about quoting a title assigned to someone or something? For example, the Wikipedia Article on Napoleon describes that he

crowned himself Emperor of the French

without quotes, but later mentions

what became known as the "Hundred Days"

with quotes. I'm neither a native speaker nor reveived particularly in-depth education on writing guidelines, so I have no idea. I just know that sometimes there are weird rules about quoting stuff.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago

But if I take them at their word and start advocating "get them before they get you", I'm the bad guy.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Jorkin DePeanus Vance should be smothered to death with a couch cushion.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Don’t joke about autoerotic asphyxiation. It’s claimed some greats

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

RIP Trevor Moore

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

This guy kills Bills

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

It's too bad these guys cannot just be treated like an internal ISIS - because that's what they are, only the threat is much, much greater.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

“The old conservative movement argued if you just got government out of the way, natural forces would resolve problems—we are no longer in this situation and must take a different approach,” Vance continues. “As Kevin Roberts writes, ‘It’s fine to take a laissez-faire approach when you are in the safety of the sunshine. But when the twilight descends and you hear the wolves, you’ve got to circle the wagons and load the muskets.'”

Roberts himself has recently called for a “Second American Revolution” — a modern-day repeat of the eight-year conflict that killed between 25,000 and 70,000 Americans. Roberts himself said that the second revolution will be “bloodless” but only “if the Left allows it to be.”

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

"Don't turn this rape into a murder" is apparently mainstream conservative philosophy now.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago

This will not hurt him, if anything it will ingratiate him with the magoos. They eat this shit up.

Imagine the fucking hypocrisy... Hillary says essentially "half the magas are a basket of deplorables" they cry foul and self select into that group, but then they go on about killing Demonrats and that's totes ok.

There was an asshat in Texas (I think) a few years back that said "the only good Democrat is a dead one" and the crowd went nutty cheering. Then he realized what he said and backtracked "I mean... Politically dead. You know the media will just twist my words." Too late fucker, the audience went nutty over the thought of killing Democrats.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Just a reminder that there is a pretty high chance that this guy becomes president given Trump's age.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

And likely intends to do so for life.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

This is his plan, if not that claim trump is unfit to hold office and take his spot. He doesn't interview like he's in it for VP he interviews like he is going to be president and it's weird.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Conservatism is a plague of death that is long overdue for a cure.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why call it conservatism at this point? At this point, they are radical theocrats.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Or radical conservatives. Or conservative theocrats.

The common element is always conservatism.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

But what are they wanting to "conserve"? Has the US ever even been what they want it to become in project 2025? Maybe in reconstruction South...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

While debatable, I believe they want to conserve a systemic hierarchy of social privilege or sense of superiority. Regardless, human cultures (at least since the renaissance) appear to have an observable gradient of ideologies that span from progressive/egalitarian to regressive/discriminatory. In western cultures, we usually refer to the latter as conservative, despite the debatability of what, exactly, they are "trying to preserve". As polarized as we are in modern U.S. politics, "conservative" is practically a team name.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 months ago

The left really need to tone down the rhetoric.

/s

load more comments
view more: next ›