this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2024
262 points (98.5% liked)

politics

18898 readers
3092 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And the gop laughs and kicks her while she cries.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Is she a Republican? They love voting for people that make their lives harder.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Why though? Haven't you heard of the marvelous trickle-down-economy? /s

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

JD talks big game about being weird “family guy” while running on platform that cuts child tax credits. At the same time these assholes are blaming Biden and Harris for cutting child tax credits.

Republicans can not be trusted for shit

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It did expire under a dem-held house, senate, and presidency.

Of course it's disingenuous as fuck for a republican to say that since the republicans are even more opposed to it.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's barely a democratic senate when they have to rely on Manchin to overcome a Republican filibuster.

But that absolutely should have been gone when they had a super majority.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Fun fact. You don't need 60 votes to kill the filibuster. Keeping the filibuster is cover for conservative Democrats.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Not accepting federal funds is plain weird.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

Republicans will guzzle from the spigot of federal highway funding no problem. It's just when there's funds available to actually have a positive effect on their communities that they decide they're fiscally conservative.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 month ago

Oh Republicans will accept federal funds for all sorts of things. It’s just that they‘re morally opposed to helping children avoid starvation.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 month ago

Something something boot straps. Twats.