this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2024
446 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19100 readers
4049 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

That VP choice was sofa king bad

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

CNN’s Bakari Sellers responded by saying, “I think that J.D. Vance is kind of the Sarah Palin of Dan Quayles.”

This is the quote of the day!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Really? Where does Palin fall on the “worst” list?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Clearly Palin would be the second-worst pick now.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't think we should take that away from her, it's all she's got.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

She's got a house she can see Russia from, that's something

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I still think Obama would have probably won. I didn't think that poorly of McCain though. Not my politics, but he seemed like a good person.

Once he picked Palin though...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Not mine either but I met him once in a hotel lobby. He was very nice to the group of high schoolers and came off as a decent person but that may have just been him being good at his job.

I always felt watching that election that he was pushed to the right and out of his comfort zone by the state of his base and even though I didn't want him to be president I felt a little sorry for him. He would have made a better president than a lot of other Republicans.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

No one was going to help McCain, he was a long shot candidate after 8 years of a Republican president that left the country exhausted and fed up, Obama was an answer, McCain was an offer to get more of the same with a little tweak here and there.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Could also be that a lot of people are waking up to just how fucking weird the Republicans actually are, too...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Captain couch fucker is the perfect cheerleader for weird.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 months ago (2 children)

"Of my lifetime..." Spot the person born after 1988.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Dan Quale misspelled potato(e) JDVance wants to end democracy...

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Dan Quayle helped save democracy!

Seriously, Pence called him looking for guidance on the electoral college certification, and it was Quayle who convinced him that he had no choice but to certify the election. He's earned the right to spell potato however he wants.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

The redemption of Dan Quayle was one of the strangest moments of our strange era in history.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Who would you say is worse? I'm not sharp on history and politics.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Dick was a horrible VP. A vile human being. But on paper he looked decent until the position. Jergin Dick just seems like a horrible choice in every way possible. Not recognizable. Bad reputation. Talks shit about his boss. And flip flopped on everything since forever. Zero integrity.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Oh my good lord I just remember Sarruh Payuhlin. JD that bad? I don’t know man.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago (2 children)

JD is much worse.

When Palin first joined the McCain ticket, she boosted his poll numbers and none of the criticism she got seemed to stick. It was only when SNL started parodying her that public opinion shifted. On paper she was exactly what McCain needed, both to shore up his base and to add some much need youth and energy, and having that whole family image that polled well with women.

Obviously we have a lot more information to go on now, but at the time Palin made sense.

Vance was a terrible pick from the beginning. He's a nut job that even Republicans aren't happy with. He appeals to nobody that wouldn't have already been a Trump supporter. He adds nothing of value, just more shit that people can easily mock and/or be terrified of.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

He adds nothing of value

He was chosen because he publicly said he would do what Mike Pence wouldn't do on January 6th.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

As would the vast majority of Republicans now, I think. There has to be more than just that.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Yeah, they keep topping themselves. Bush Sr was probably a weird choice for the time, being the CIA guy.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Atleast her selection gave us quality pornography like Who's Nailin' Paylin? What would JD give us, just a creep molesting furnature.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Cock Chainee

load more comments
view more: next ›