I kinda hope he didn't
this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2024
150 points (98.1% liked)
politics
18789 readers
2741 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
i hope trump doesn't let him go to ikea by himself
i heard he only fucks furniture from pier 1
Vance really was a horrible choice for a running mate. I've been wondering why Trump chose him, for many of the reasons this article outlines. But as with anything and everything Trump related, there is no coherent rationale. It all boils down to money, obedience, ego-stroking, and exploitation of the rubes.
He chose Pence and Vance because their names have 5 letters just like his and they're symmetrical on campaign signs. I don't think there's any deeper logic. He doesn't care who it is as long as they're "loyal" and will help potentially steal an election.
Maybe the party let him choose Vance because they’re letting Trump sabotage himself because they see the writing on the wall, and think they just need to let this stupidity play out…? That, or they’ve well and truly given up on the Democratic process, and their plan A has become “just try to stage another coup”, so they went for the most virulent, crazy VP they could find.
No, they’ve spent years purging anyone who would say no to Trump.
It’s probably the most obvious reason, money.
I think it's because he looks like DT Junior, but slightly better looking
It's the eye liner.
Trump related, there is no coherent rationale
this is what most people have the hardest time with. everyone needs to drop the assumption that anything ever needs to make sense to republicans. normal people, most people, need things to make sense. 100% not the case with republicans. when you have the capacity to replace actual reality with whatever bullshit fantasy reality trump happened to pull out of his ass just now, then everything that comprised your world before that moment goes away. there is no contradiction, no "cognitive dissonance."
like you said, it's about the money and the power. it seems like it should be more than that, but it's not
No sane person would be on a ticket with Trump at this point. All they have is utter whackjobs.
All that's left as a recruiting pool are people who know nothing about Trump, people who are too dumb to realize they are disposable at the first convenience, and people who failed their way up into his orbit and have been so shielded from consequence that they can't conceive of something not working out in their favor.
I figure he went to Trump, told him he'd do whatever he was told, and he'd appeal to younger people. Trump probably cut him off and said you had me at" whatever you want"
I feel like the whole right is imploding. And I'm happy, but confused.
I kinda feel like: https://youtu.be/LNTw3x40I0o?si=vKITWlkTyU6nfdgT
The Republican response to the cat-lady discourse is split between claiming that it’s unfair—the clip is three years old and has undoubtedly been pushed by Democrats who suspect it’s a turnoff to swing voters—and that it’s awesome.
And no suggestion from any conservatives that Vance's "discourse" is wrong.
In other words, not split at all.
This is his Sarah Palin lol
JD Vance brought Peter Thiel's cash to the table, technically. This whole thing was bought and paid for.
It’s so weird. Peter Theil is a ladder pulling openly gay billionaire whose policies are anti-gay.
Cognitive dissonance is a hell of a motivator.
When you have that much money, your sexuality is meaningless in comparison to your wealth. He can buy his way out of just about any problem, so what does he care if normal gay people are murdered in the street when there's* money to be made?
Peter Thiel is a fucking mess and, as a pansexual man, a point of semi-horror semi-pride that we've come so far that a man can chose to be an openly gay anti-gay policy wonk running a huge surveillance company that's been used to persecute homosexuals that's completely reliant on US defense spending while openly criticizing US taxation and advocating for a Libretarian society.
There isn't currently a widely accepted term for an Uncle Tom but for gay folks... so maybe we should just use the term Uncle Thiel in his honor.
Reading that almost gave me an aneurysm. Hate this timeline.
I’d throw Uncle Clarence Thomas’ name in that hat, for sure.
Uncle Peter would be a closer match to the original term, but I agree.
I thought of using that but it sounds too much like a creepy sexual thing.
I guarantee there is some creepy sex shit in this man's life. You don't accept your sexuality (though outted by Gawker) and then try to use your power against people who share your sexuality and not have some weird shit going on.
Like couch fucking weird? Or something worse?
It's not weird at all when you realize that to billionaires, instigating culture wars to distract from and prevent class wars is essential to maintaining bilionaire status.
the GOP already had the internet-edgelord vote sewn up.
LOL
They did another Sarah Palin.
Unsurprising that the party hellbent on hiding from reality succumbed to stepping on the same rake twice.