I thought this was clearly accepted as a phenomenon that started when Americans started to switch from radio to television.
this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2024
191 points (99.0% liked)
politics
19097 readers
3168 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Dude deffo knows about the first Nixon Kennedy debate where Nixon looked like warmed over death and it absolutely fucked with his numbers.
My understanding is the room was intentionally extra toasty to get Nixon extra sweaty. Pretty crafty move if true.
I mean. Reagan was literally a movie star. Kennedy wasn’t exactly hideous. Clinton was charming. (Bill, not Hilary.)
Lincoln had a sort of ruggedly handsome look (and to be blunt he was buff as hell- a skilled wrestler, he was known to toss townspeople. For reasons…)
And there’s Obama.that dude will rock a tan suit like nobody’s business.
In fact, the only president of recent memory I would say was straight up hideous was Trump. But even that is part of his “brand” or something.
(Though seriously. Dude can afford a tailor. He should look one up.)
Edit: I’d ask where Bernie has been the last few hundred years, but I guess someone has to actually do their job in Washington.
Trump looks like he gets groomed and styled by Florida beauty school dropouts that do it for the honor of serving their savior (for free, with whatever products they have lying around or can get on the cheap). Probably can't go to a regular barber anymore with his reputation of not paying for services rendered.
I’m gonna have to stop you right there. Abraham Lincoln was ugly as fuck. Possibly the greatest president of all time. But he didn’t grow that beard until some little girl said, (paraphrasing) “U-G-L-Y, you ain’t got no alibi, you ugly. [clap clap] You ugly.”
Either Lincoln or FDR is probably the greatest president and both of them had to overcome a major disability. FDR had polio and was in a wheelchair and Lincoln without a beard was so ugly, you could have pressed his face in dough and made gorilla cookies. And I suspect that’s why they both had the resoluteness and empathy required to be a truly great leader. (And probably why Lincoln was so buff. He was getting no hoes with that craggy visage.)
And Lincoln knew it.
If I were two-faced, would I be wearing this one?
- Abraham Lincoln
Nixon would have easily won reelection if not for the advent of political debates being televized. Kennedy was so charming and charismatic next to Nixon's sweaty and brutish appearance that his poll numbers skyrocketed. I would argue that is the likely beginning of the 'beauty contest' as we're claiming it. Unfortunately it's for good reason. In global politics, charisma and physical beauty or charm plays into negotiation. Whether people like it or not, physical attraction is a guiding force in our natural selection and social psychology.
I’d suggest people were always concerned about attractiveness. Pre-televised debates they used radio broadcasts.
I imagine if you sounded like a goose being strangled, you would be disadvantaged to some one with that golden voice.
I mean he's right
Politics is all about sympathy for many people and pretty people have a headstart in that department statistics wise
Well that explains why Bernie was wearing stalkings and a mini skirt.
..........I'm still unclear why he was throwing fried chicken at birds though......
I'm loving his Dada phase