this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
507 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

59378 readers
2612 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

I haven't had much hope that if there was an major asteroid racing towards earth that there could be much done about it, but I also know that likelyhood of it is very small so there is no need to lose sleep over it.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 4 months ago (1 children)

"Sustaining the space mission, disaster preparedness, and communications efforts across a 14-year timeline would be challenging due to budget cycles, changes in political leadership, personnel, and ever-changing world events," the report says.

First administration: "We must do something about the asteroid. I've started a plan to divert it, but it'll take several years."

Second administration: "The asteroid is a corrupt globalist conspiracy. We never needed to divert asteroids in the past, why do we supposedly need to spend all your hard-earned tax dollars on this all of a sudden? I will prove my anti-elitist attitudes by cancelling the asteroid program as soon as I take office."

Third administration: "Yes we recognize that the asteroid is a threat, but as we saw last time there's just too much political resistance to solving it. Let's focus on other priorities that we can solve."

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

Yea that and panic at the end !

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

Sorry don't you mean let's fund AI?

/s

[–] [email protected] 49 points 4 months ago (2 children)

We've already solved this. We just need to train a team of dysfunctional oil drillers to send up to the asteroid.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

🎵 Don't wanna close my eyes 🎵

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I don't even remember what movie that was

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Armageddon, the mega block buster hit movie of 1998

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Thanks! I can't for the life of me remember when I watched that, especially since I wasn't even alive when that came out. Maybe we watched it in school or something

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Not to be confused with the other mega block buster hit movie about an asteroid hitting earth released one month earlier in 1998, Deep Impact.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Deep Impact is to Armageddon as Volcano is to Dante's Peak.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

almost forgot about Dante's peak. that was the shit!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I would have sworn it was Space Cowboys. Shit.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 months ago

That's okay, humanity had s good run. I imagine we'll have extinctified ourselves way before a space rock could do it. A+ for trying though.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 4 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That's the last three words of the article. The author didn't miss the connection either.

I always wonder when people repeat something from the article or ask a question that's answered in the article: did you not read it or did you just want to start a discussion about this connection and are somehow constrained in the number of words you can write per day?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

I didn't read it. The Register has a drier tone than I felt like reading today. I mean seriously, putting the word tabletop in quotes? I am NOT the target audience for that writing style.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 4 months ago (2 children)

It was a great movie - sadly, because it was so accurate. Provided that you can call a sci-fi movie accurate. But after the pandemic and shit, "don't look up" looks like a playbook for a meteor extinction level event

[–] [email protected] 22 points 4 months ago

What's funny is that movie released during the pandemic, so it seemed like that was the thing it was commenting on, but actually it was filmed before the pandemic and was originally meant as a commentary on climate change. What it shows is that humanity's modern tribalism is remarkably predictable. No matter what the problem, we will turn it into an us versus them situation where getting anything meaningful done becomes an uphill battle.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Actually they say that Comet Dibiasky is twice the size of the dinosaur killer, but they also say it's 6-1 9 kilometres wide. 10 kilometres is the size of Chicxulub. Scientifically it was very inaccurate. But politically it's flawless.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

We are not at a point where the "global community" is more than a few competing, egoistic and greedy tribes with clashing world views, so that's no surprise.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I think that really it wouldn't be the "global community" that ends up saving the world in an asteroid impact scenario.

It would likely be an organization that could operate on its own without endless committees. Say, the Chinese space agency, or SpaceX, or the Indian space agency. Someone would decide to just do it, without getting the whole world's approval for the mission. Then the whole world would complain that the effort was made without any international cooperation or oversight. And the organization that literally saved the world would get chewed out by everyone because inevitably the plan will not have worked perfectly.

But I'm not worried, because even billionaires don't want to die. Someone would do something.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

would you trust Boeing to save you from an asteroid?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

I'd trust them to try to intercept an asteroid... It'll be harmless when they miss and achieve nothing, but in the off chance that they pull it off, yeah sure Boeing, go for it.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Achievement unlocked: discovering the Great Filter.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

If an asteroid were to hit the Earth large enough to cause human extinction, it would save us the embarrassment of killing ourselves from poisoning the climate or microplastic pollution.

I'm pretty sure we navigated nuclear holocaust, but we haven't fully ruled it out either.

load more comments
view more: next ›