this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
815 points (98.9% liked)

News

22903 readers
3756 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Fix the Court, the group that released the findings, calculated the total in gifts from January 2004 to December 2023 and said the nine current justices received 344 gifts totaling nearly $3million.

Supreme Court justices received $3million in gifts throughout the last two decades, a watchdog group revealed on Thursday - with controversial Justice Clarence Thomas accounting for nearly 80 percent. 

Thomas, who has come under fire for accepting gifts from billionaire Harlan Crow, led the group of justices with the highest value of gifts accepted at $2.4million, according to Court News Service.

Fix the Court, the group that released the findings, calculated the total in gifts from January 2004 to December 2023 and said the nine current justices received 344 gifts totaling nearly $3million.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

Fix the court? The court is fixed!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

This guy doesn't say a word for decades. Now he can't stop being an ass.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

He didn't even have to hide gold bars in his underwear like Menendez.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Wait a second, my friends have never given me anything close to a million dollar gift. What assholes

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (2 children)

There is no point in following the rules when the people in power clearly don't.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

Sure there is. Unlike them, if you break the rules you go to jail.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

There's a big point. A gun point.

The difference between you and Clarence Thomas is simply what each of you can get away with. Cops won't come knocking on Thomas's door for this. In fact, they'll guard his door.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago

All that GOP complaining about activist judges was just another example that every accusation is an admission. They were stacking all the courts with activist judges so they could throw out elections and install a christofascist dictatorship. Trump's reelection is the final step. They kill him off once he's elected along with whatever simpleton sycophant he chooses as his running mate and install the christofascist speaker of the house at president. They telegraphed that when they claimed that the Democrats were going to kill of Biden to install Harris as president. Every single accusation is an admission.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Annnnnnd the party of law and order will want to do something about this right? RiiiiIiightt?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I wish we had public servants who did their fucking job for their base pay, just like the rest of us do.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You're assuming this isn't the job of the nation's highest court.

Take the money, legitimize the misconduct, channel people's rage into impotence.

It's so easy to forget that a certain Senator from Delaware voted Clarence Thomas out of committee in 1989, rather than killing the nomination, because his own corporate bosses told him to.

30 years later, Thomas is doing exactly what he was put on the bench to accomplish. And Biden's response is to shrug helplessly and tell you that you should have voted harder.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Best comment I’ve read this week.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

appointing like 90 more supreme court justices would make this cost prohibitive

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

Gotta make it an even 100. Two for each state o_0

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Uncle Tom's Courtroom.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Wait so all the justices recieved $3M in gifts, and $2.4M of that was to Thomas? That's like 80% of the gifts.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Maybe a better approach would be to distribute the gifts equally amongst the justices. That way they could all graft equally. Equal graft under the law!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

From each according to their corruption, to each according to their greed

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

That he's reported. Who knows what else isn't on the radar yet, because that corrupt fucker keeps "misremembering" to report gifts like private school tuition, RV loans that get forgiven, and several vacations a year.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I'm mostly just annoyed that democracy was sold that cheaply.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Cheaply? There aren't enough guys going to home Depot and not enough lube for me to earn that much over 3 lifetimes if that's all I did.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago

Every single time dude. Every time I see what a politician was paid to worsen their constituents' lives, the dollar amount tied to it is just never that remarkable, especially in the context of a world where Elon Musk gets a $56bn pay package for nothing in return.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 months ago

Obvious corruption.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 months ago

Straight to jail for corruption

[–] [email protected] 31 points 3 months ago

lol that isn’t shit. The corporations buy and sell this guy like a slave. 2.4M are pennies to these people. That money is nothing to them. Fuck you Clarence Thomas.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

Nothing wrong with working for the highest pay - just let your employer know who you are really working for.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

That's only the starterpack compared to high profile politicians and CEOs.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Everyone must know that we are only seeing the tiniest tip of the actual iceberg.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago

For sure, or he would have taken up John Oliver on his offer.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago

Not just so far. That we know of so far.

I'd be amazed if the real number wasn't many times this.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 3 months ago (4 children)

so why can't anybody do anything? why does he still get to wear the robe and have such a say in the world? maybe the good guys should start breaking rules as well to get things done since the right has already established that precedent. they're not gonna just start playing nice because the democrats are.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

Because all US politicians do this. Including all the ones on the Supreme Court. The entire system is corrupt. That’s why Roberts wont go before anyone and discuss it or why no one is really pushing too hard to do anything to him about it. They all do the same thing in one form or the other.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

the good guys should start breaking rules

The rich right supports people like their Proud Boys, Three Percenters and the Oath Keepers to keep people in line but not so much on the left and they are dealt with much more harshly by law enforcement for the similar crimes.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

so be smart about it. all it takes is one lone wolf that doesn't keep a cell phone to study movements of these figures.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

At this point, you really haven't learned the answer to this question? Like, the real answer? Even though this comes up in every article on this for the last year at least?

[–] [email protected] 31 points 3 months ago

This is how the American system works. He's just not being classy about it.

Congressmembers do insider trading all the time and move into industry positions after they leave, having helped those exact industries (following the requests of their lobbyists). Congressmembers go straight to the top of boards for weapons manufacturers, pharmaceutical companies, etc.

Regulators and other officials do the same thing. They cycle back and forth between the industries they're supposed to reign in and supposedly the job where they do reign them in. Work for the FCC -> work for a telecom -> FCC -> telecom.

In terms of the Supreme Court itself, it is an illegitimate body that has legitimacy only because the other two branches give it to them. Their major powers are not in the constitution and they have very few rules to follow.

You are right that gaining power to establish justice is what really matters, not "the rules" (which are always selectively applied). But it really depends on what you mean by the "good guys". If you mean Democrats, unfortunately they are also deeply embedded in this system and are not champions against it. They maintain power through the same kinds of industry connections and exit strategies and insider training. Their electoral apparatus is built on getting donations from companies and their executives so that they can buy ads and canvassers and phone bankers and data nerds to reach out and drive likely voters to turn out for them.

I've been in high-ish level Dem offices on various occasions. They put a lot of effort into shmoozing with donors and doing everything they can to get more money from likely donors. Big and small, though big get the most attention. The idea of building their base of power from the action of motivated grassroots individuals is rejected. And that's the only real base of power that is likely to reflect justice.

load more comments
view more: next ›