this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

4081 readers
13 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In other news: water is wet. I think we all knew that Charles wouldn't have to go through the same pains us common British folk do in regards to accessing healthcare. But nonetheless I think it's important to continue to highlight these ever growing class divisions in the UK, such as those between people who can afford private healthcare and people who have to rely on our public services. People in positions of authority and power in our country do not understand the struggles of everyday British people.


My TL;DR:

Charles is already receiving expert care for his cancer within days of diagnosis. His speedy treatment should draw fresh attention to the long cancer treatment waiting times that most British people experience with the NHS.

The proportion of patients in England waiting less than 62 days from an urgent suspected cancer referral or consultant upgrade to their first definitive treatment for cancer is 65.2%.

Amid growing frustration at NHS waiting lists, record numbers of people are paying for private healthcare. Nearly 300,000 people in the UK have paid for chemotherapy in the last five years.

Survival rates for cancer in the UK lag behind those of other European countries for nine out of 10 of the most common types of the disease.

Researchers said cancer waiting times across the country were among the worst on record, too many cancers were diagnosed at a late stage, and access to treatment was unequal.

Buckingham Palace has not specified whether the king is receiving private healthcare or being treated on the National Health Service.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

This country and the people who run it is a fucking joke. This is no different to Victorian era shit, except we’re supposed to be more civilised nowadays and accept these freeloaders to get preferential treatment? Fuck off, paid thieves is what they are.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Of course he didn't have to wait he's probably going private, which other people could do too. This isn't an issue of him being a king, and everything to do with him being rich.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'd be more annoyed if a rich guy didn't use private healthcare tbh.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

If we banned private healthcare the rich would have an incentive to make socialised healthcare better.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Critical support to his cancer in its heroic war against this filthy monarch

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

Ah ca ira! ca ira! Ah ca ira!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

Oh, maybe he's is not being treated on the island meaning Britain, ... but that other one where doctors regularly fly in.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

A proper leader would ensure all of his subjects are treated before him. If he wishes to speed his own process he should fix the system, not circumvent or commandeer it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

He’s the monarch…. I’m … not surprised in the least.

Banish the monarchy if you want to complain.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

It would be nice if you could abstain from paying a proportion of tax to the monarchy and making it opt-in to support it

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

Banishing the monarchy won't help the problem of long waiting lists though. At least is has brought the issue to the front page and people are aware of the seriousness of the problem. Let's hope they vote for a party that will do something about it in the next elections

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

Head of State: Receives treatment for cancer

Everyone else: Angry

It's all very well going on about the widening wealth divide, the head of state is going to get priority treatment no matter how long or short the waiting lists are

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

the head of state is going to get priority treatment no matter how long or short the waiting lists are

Yes, that's the problem...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Are we going to pretend he isn't head of state because of the womb he came out of?

"The monarch, because of his blood lineage, will get priority treatment no matter how long or short the peasant waiting lists are" doesn't have the same ring.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Are we going to pretend that any other form of head of state wouldn't also get priority treatment?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

If the country had an actually decent head of state I doubt many would be mad at this.

Of course, then there wouldn't be a waiting time for people to get mad at in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

The head of state is going to get priority treatment no matter how long or short the waiting lists are.

Ok? I think everyone knew this was going to happen. The point is it shouldn't happen, everyone should be given the same opportunities to have their cancer treated swiftly.

I'm not angry that he's receiving treatment. I'm angry because of how many people with treatable cancer are dying because they're not being treated.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I agree that it would be better if the NHS was able to treat everyone with the same response that the King has received. I just don't see what this has to do with anything: If he had decided to use the NHS and get the normal waiting time the system would be just as broken.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

My intention was to highlight how the wealthy elite do not personally experience just how broken the NHS is (which includes the PM, the monarchy, and many UK politicians).

If our monarchy and politicians had to go through the NHS for their medical issues then I imagine a lot more work would be done to improve the NHS.

Instead, the Conservatives are trying to destroy the NHS. And this is shown by how cancer treatment is becoming increasingly inaccessible (depending on class divides, where those with power in our country are able to more readily access treatment).

The point is ultimately that we shouldn't continue to let the wealthy elite represent us, because they do not understand the issues that we face.

None of this is new information of course, the situation that the article features is just a good example and reminder of this.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I agree with you, I just think that the king isn't a good example of this because he'd be getting priority treatment no matter what; he's the head of state

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

I sure hope that boot tastes good

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

As I said earlier, the head of state shouldn't be getting priority treatment in the first place.

If the head of state didn't get priority treatment his entire life then more work would be done to improve the treatment of everyone.

I'm not sure how else I can phrase this point for you.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's not even about him, they bury this in a story about class struggle so they can repeat the narrative that the NHS is "in crisis," as if it just magically happens and not because politicians are purposefully crippling it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

Who is "they"? The Guardian (where the linked article is from) has often published articles about how the Conservatives are destroying the NHS.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

My best wishes to the cancer. It must not be easy to contract a king.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

A nasty malignant form of ancient evil ruthlessly attacking the poor cancer.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

LMAO my comment saying that cancer got a king was deleted by mods because I guess you can’t say anything bad about the king here. Classic.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

Through federation magic I can still see the comment.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

But he's such a stand-up guy. We should totally stop everything and treat this manchild. After all, what would we do without him??

load more comments
view more: next ›