United Kingdom
General community for news/discussion in the UK.
Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].
Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
view the rest of the comments
Head of State: Receives treatment for cancer
Everyone else: Angry
It's all very well going on about the widening wealth divide, the head of state is going to get priority treatment no matter how long or short the waiting lists are
Yes, that's the problem...
Are we going to pretend he isn't head of state because of the womb he came out of?
"The monarch, because of his blood lineage, will get priority treatment no matter how long or short the peasant waiting lists are" doesn't have the same ring.
Are we going to pretend that any other form of head of state wouldn't also get priority treatment?
If the country had an actually decent head of state I doubt many would be mad at this.
Of course, then there wouldn't be a waiting time for people to get mad at in the first place.
Ok? I think everyone knew this was going to happen. The point is it shouldn't happen, everyone should be given the same opportunities to have their cancer treated swiftly.
I'm not angry that he's receiving treatment. I'm angry because of how many people with treatable cancer are dying because they're not being treated.
I agree that it would be better if the NHS was able to treat everyone with the same response that the King has received. I just don't see what this has to do with anything: If he had decided to use the NHS and get the normal waiting time the system would be just as broken.
My intention was to highlight how the wealthy elite do not personally experience just how broken the NHS is (which includes the PM, the monarchy, and many UK politicians).
If our monarchy and politicians had to go through the NHS for their medical issues then I imagine a lot more work would be done to improve the NHS.
Instead, the Conservatives are trying to destroy the NHS. And this is shown by how cancer treatment is becoming increasingly inaccessible (depending on class divides, where those with power in our country are able to more readily access treatment).
The point is ultimately that we shouldn't continue to let the wealthy elite represent us, because they do not understand the issues that we face.
None of this is new information of course, the situation that the article features is just a good example and reminder of this.
I agree with you, I just think that the king isn't a good example of this because he'd be getting priority treatment no matter what; he's the head of state
I sure hope that boot tastes good
As I said earlier, the head of state shouldn't be getting priority treatment in the first place.
If the head of state didn't get priority treatment his entire life then more work would be done to improve the treatment of everyone.
I'm not sure how else I can phrase this point for you.
It's not even about him, they bury this in a story about class struggle so they can repeat the narrative that the NHS is "in crisis," as if it just magically happens and not because politicians are purposefully crippling it.
Who is "they"? The Guardian (where the linked article is from) has often published articles about how the Conservatives are destroying the NHS.