this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2024
614 points (97.5% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3964 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

One in three Republican voters would have preferred a different candidate to Donald Trump for the upcoming presidential election.

In March, the former president won enough primary races to secure the Republican nomination in the 2024 presidential election.

However, according to a survey of 1,003 Americans by Canadian polling firm Leger, Trump does not command the full support of his base and 33 percent of this demographic would have preferred another politician. Meanwhile, this proportion is higher (47 percent) among Republican voters aged 18 to 34 years old.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

meanwhile two of three republicans can still taste their colons.

when will these people pull their heads out of their asses?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Which means 2 out of 3 will gleefully vote for him with visible metaphorical (?) erections; the 1 out of 3 will maybe metaphorically cover up their metaphorical erections with a pillow...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

Which means 2 out of 3 will gleefully vote for him

Listen, I don't like him any more than you do, but he's the only candidate who can beat Other Candidate, alright? If you don't want another four years of Disastrous Joe Brandon's Economy Killing Policies of Doom ruining our country with Woke, the only man who has consistently succeeded in Making America Great Again is the guy who won the primary.

the 1 out of 3 will maybe metaphorically cover up their metaphorical erections with a pillow…

They will be shamed into compliance by their MAGA neighbors, because if you're not voting for Trump then you must secretly support Biden. You need to prove that you aren't a soy transgender liberal pedophile or we won't invite you to the next wine cave fundraiser / good ole boy tailgate party / Epstein Island junket.

You're either with us or you're with the Terrorists.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Those numbers are worringly low. I have been assuming that the vocal group, the ones taking to the streets with their little hats and grumpy faces, were a very verbal minority. I'd expect way more than 1/3 to prefer some other candidate. Not great.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

I don't know why. These numbers are better than I expected. The GOP has become a cult like organization. Those usually don't tolerate non believers.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Surprise Pikachu 😱😱😱😱

[–] [email protected] 34 points 5 months ago (2 children)

They'll vote for him anyway.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Some will, but some will also just not feel as engaged and stay home.

Real question is, how large a percentage of potential Trump voters will be demotivated enough to stay home, vs how many potential Biden voters are being turned off by his age and ball-less stance on the war crimes in Gaza.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

You get a president that does nothing to stop Isreal or a president who signs the bombs with an erection. Those are the choices. As always.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

Real question is, how will around 2000 people in the midwest vote? Cause that's what usually decides the outcome.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I really think Biden is secretly more popular with Republicans than individual Republicans let on. He hasn't spoken much on abortion and queer support (kind of like it belongs in the background unseen and then we will tolerate it mentality), he wants to lock down the US-Mexico border more, and is very Zionist. He's honestly a good fit for the Republicans before Trump "consolidated" the Republicans under a[n even] crazier branch of conservatism.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I think that's his "plan", whether it works or not we'll see.

The reality is, most "progressives", that are screaming about Gaza, etc. Are in deep blue states. Their votes don't matter in the electoral view. It's a total of like 3 states that are going to decide the presidency.

Which is one of many reasons our system sucks so bad...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

It's definitely one of the more important reasons why our system is suffering. A minority of rural voters have way too much influence. How are we supposed to navigate the future with that kind of albatross around our necks?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

If only youths consistently came out to vote.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

I fully endorse Trump if it means it's sabotaging the GOP fascists from the inside lol

Who could've known that an extremist criminal as your leader might cause issues.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

How many had their choice made for them before they even had a chance to vote in a primary?

Nikki Haley was the last to drop out on March 6th, when there were still dozens of primaries to go.

I'd love to see a national primary. But people complain... But... but... it's not fair to small candidates who can't run a national campaign...

Yeah, if you can't run a national campaign, you have no business being President either.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

If we're going to be proposing things that will never happen: Total public funding of elections, so everybody can run a national campaign if they get enough signatures.

That or we get a watery tart to lob a scimitar at someone.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 5 months ago

Better headline: 2 out of 3 Republicans (the party of "Law and Order") support a candidate convicted of 34 felonies. And 3 out of 3 will still vote for him in the general election.

The original headline is just them saying I wish there was something better, but we got what we got. Which is the same thing I am saying on the left.

load more comments
view more: next ›