this post was submitted on 25 May 2024
533 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

59161 readers
2115 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Tack "&udm=14" on to the end of a normal search, and you'll be booted into the clean 10 blue links interface. While Google might not let you set this as a default, if you have a way to automatically edit the Google search URL, you can create your own defaults.

(page 2) 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

It works. In Vivaldi just add the parameter at the end of the search URL in the search settings configuration.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

"For good."

Until Google finds a workaround.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They don't need to "find" a workaround. They put this there. This isn't some sorta "hack", it's literally a feature Google built into the page. This feature will exist for exactly as long as Google wants it to.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 62 points 5 months ago (4 children)

This won't last long. It's too public now. Google will find a way to kill it and force their AI on you as much as possible.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Google's too smart for that. They know there's a big backlash against AI in the tech savvy crowd and that it's bleeding users to competitors. So they offer this escape valve that they know the techies will easily find and use, but which 99% of the population will never even look for. This way they can still push AI on almost everyone while at the same time retain as many disgruntled techies as they can.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Google kills its golden goose search engine and is thought here up be too smart to disable a workaround... I'm doubtful.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 months ago (5 children)

You're giving them a lot more credit than is probably warranted. They've killed off so many popular things and workarounds that really cost them nothing to leave available for the tech savvy they've very much shut down to force people to use the systems they want to push.

googie hasn't been tech savvy friendly for a while now

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

I can think of a couple examples, like leaving the boot loader unlocked on their pixel phones. You might be right though.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

what does that parameter mean though?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago

Ultra dumb mode. Others only go up to 10, but googles goes all the way to 14.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Truthfully, the way I cut out most of the noise everywhere is to search using duckduckgo lite on Librewolf/Mull browsers. That with ublock origin (and block cookie banners), noscript, and redirection extensions to nojs alternatives like libreddit, scribe, invidious, along with putting various bypass paywall scripts into ublock's filter list. It all just adds up to an overall better experience with fast, to the point results.

[–] [email protected] 68 points 5 months ago

Show google who’s boss by still using the product.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I can’t help but be curious, does udm=13 or udm=15 do anything?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

Don't try it! You'll regret it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You can still have a laugh with the new page, like that extreme confidence highlighting the wrong answers.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

Disinfotainment at its best.

[–] [email protected] 121 points 5 months ago (2 children)

It's easier to just use duckduckgo

[–] [email protected] 32 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (14 children)

I just wish I could search a term of more than 2 words and get relevant results rather than pages that contain at least one of the words in high volumes. That's the only reason I ever use google, for years now. Encasing the words in quotes doesn't seem to function at all on DDG, either.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 75 points 5 months ago (1 children)

"kill ai search for good"

Yeah, ok. It's a feature and Google will kill it eventually.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I never get these things where people are like "ah ha, we outsmarted the company by using an undocumented* feature they provide!" But like, they control the feature and they know it exists, you're not getting away with something.

* or sometimes even documented

[–] [email protected] 29 points 5 months ago

I tricked target into lowering prices by using this coupon they had on their website! Mwhahaha.

Google will just use this as a way to flag their tech savvy and anti-ai users. It's just another data point.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 5 months ago (2 children)

A small proxy site was written to do this for you: https://udm14.com/

[–] [email protected] 38 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (5 children)

Can also just add a custom search engine to Firefox with the search URL string:

https://www.google.com/search?udm=14&q=%s

No need to go through a completely separate site.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 5 months ago (1 children)

And this way you'll be sure the intermediate site isn't also scraping your data.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

That site is open source, in GitHub. Not much to it.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago (3 children)

wait, is the AI thing automatically enabled in the US?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Hmm, not for me for some reason.

Edit: looks like it depends on the search.

I dunno, I don't use Google almost ever.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 88 points 5 months ago

It's a shame that they'll certainly prioritize nerfing this over fixing actual problems

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


If you're tired of Google's AI Overview extracting all value from the web while also telling people to eat glue or run with scissors, you can turn it off—sort of.

It's actually pretty nice, showing only the traditional 10 blue links, giving you a clean (well, other than the ads), uncluttered results page that looks like it's from 2011.

Most of these only mean something to Google's internal tracking system, but that "&udm=14" line is the one that will put you in a web search.

If you don't want it to be the default, shortcut/alias will let you selectively launch this search from the address bar by starting your query with the shortcut text.

Omitting "gw" will still launch Google's AI idiot box, which will probably tell you that rocks are delicious.

So, while this Band-Aid solution is interesting, things are getting so bad that the real recommendation is probably to switch to something other than Google at this point.


The original article contains 888 words, the summary contains 160 words. Saved 82%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

probably tell you that rocks are delicious

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rock_candy

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›