this post was submitted on 19 May 2024
766 points (96.6% liked)

solarpunk memes

2837 readers
378 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

It is time to hold mother nature accountable!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago (4 children)

I'm so confused about the text. why would the climate paralyze climate activists? and what does that have to do with the image? so confused.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Because the top text should read "when climate change instead of climate activists...". It confused me for half a minute too

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

oooohhhhhh, is that what they meant. that makes more sense

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Are we doing the switcheroo thing on Lemmy? How does it work? Do we link to Reddit?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

wE jusT neeD tO sPend a feW, MorE billioN raisinG thE road Aa littlE BiT hiGher...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

ETDOPWNENGEAETG

[–] [email protected] 26 points 5 months ago

Climate activists paralyze traffic with protests - straight to jail. Climate paralyzes traffic - pikachu face.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 6 months ago

Theyre still not gonna make the connection

[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 months ago

The climate knows that doing a protest that blocks highways are illiegal.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So what you're saying is, we need tougher laws against activists! /s

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

Beat it with a baton until it stops resisting

[–] [email protected] 27 points 6 months ago

Give post10 15 minutes with a simple rake and traffic will be back normal

[–] [email protected] 156 points 6 months ago (3 children)

"I'm pepper spraying the water but it won't stop obstructing traffic!"

  • Local police probably
[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I keep punching and choking it but it keeps coming back for more! Oh... Oh God..... IT LOOKS EVEN DARKER NOW!!! EVERY POLICE MAN FOR HIMSELF

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

OFFICER DOWN!!!

BLAM BLAM BLAM BLAM

I'M HIT! I'M HIT!!

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago (2 children)

This is Germany. Most bullets fired here end up in deer instead of people.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Here in Germany the police tend to call the responsible hunter to avoid the paperwork, that comes with shooting their weapons.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

That might depend on the police force (i.e., state) we’re talking about. My colleague told me that when he hit a deer and called the police with the deer still lying around, they just shot it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

As it should be

Deer is delicious

[–] [email protected] 50 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Must not be American police. That water would be half bullets here.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Nah, the acorn won't be very loud when it hits the water.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Maybe there's a hidden sheet of tin just below the water surface, you never know

[–] [email protected] 51 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Looks like bad engineering to me.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 6 months ago (1 children)

When people talk about the cost of climate change, the updated/improved replacement engineering and construction are some of those costs. And the same exact people who initially denied climate change even existed and who are now downplaying its effects are the exact same people who will complain about the additional costs caused by the consequence of inaction.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Corporate spin: Climate change is creating more engineering jobs! We should keep at it!

[–] [email protected] 112 points 6 months ago (2 children)

A lot of engineering was done assuming that rainfall behaved the way it did in the past. That's not a valid assumption anymore.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Those "once in a lifetime" or "once in a decade" weather events seem to be quite common these days

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

seem to be quite common these days

As well as "once in a lifetime" financial crisis in the US.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 6 months ago (2 children)

"Another 100 year flood" seems like a ridiculous headline at this point. Denial is everywhere.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Somewhat off topic but just some trivia from a geology weather class I took

100 year flood does not mean it happens every 100 years but there’s a 1/100 chance for it to happen annually

Putting climate change aside for a second for consistency sake, you could go for 150 or 200 years without a 100 year flood or on the other side only a 5 year gap for that 100 year flood if you’re unlucky

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That's correct, it's about probability based on past known history. An area could get unlucky and have repeat conditions sooner than normal. When many areas appear to be having this same bad luck, it's time to reevaluate the probabilities. It's also why regular weather forecasts haven't seemed to get things as right as they used to...using the past percent chance probabilities in a changing environment doesn't hit as well as it used to.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Thanks for the input it never crossed my mind that weather (the thing that we can only predict) changes when the past data is no longer relevant

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

And a big problem we're having is that due to climate change those 1/100 chance events are changing for the worst.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Oh 10000% it’s why I said ignoring climate change. Weather events are getting more frequent and more extreme

[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 months ago

"sure, the forest I played in as a kid is silent, the trees are dying, insects are sparse, we go back and forth between buried in 10ft of snow and heat wave drought inside a month, the river is low enough that it exposed carvings of 1,000 year old famine warnings, but we keep getting flooded every year with once in a lifetime storms, but there's NO EVIDENCE of climate change and I can prove it because [politician/company] said so"

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

At some point even the best plans aren't going to be enough, and the more we built the worse it gets. When an area gets water amounts in a day that it used to get in a year, that water simply isn't going anywhere fast. You know how evolution is about adaptation? I don't think we're adapting all that well or fast enough. (Yes, it's not quite the same thing, but the same point. Don't change, don't expect to survive)

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

B-b-but climate change isn't happening? - Republicans then

B-b-but think of the eCoNoMy!? - Republicans now

Climate change is happening and we should do something about it! - Bernie Sanders, always

img

Where did all these weird weather events come from? - centrists

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If we ever do get the point of starting to actually fix climate change, those same Republicans will be whining that we should keep things the way they are (because by that point the rich will have figured out some way to profit from it).

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Trump pulled out of the Paris Climate Accord, citing how Obama was being too radical about it all, so what you said literally has already happened!

Edit: but since you asked, they indeed do keep giving! https://programming.dev/post/14301895