Me, but with houseplants, gardening tools and recentlyβ¦ a set of bagpipes. π
this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2025
139 points (92.1% liked)
Lemmy Shitpost
32690 readers
3893 users here now
Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.
Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!
Rules:
1. Be Respectful
Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.
Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.
...
2. No Illegal Content
Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.
That means:
-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals
-No CSA content or Revenge Porn
-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)
...
3. No Spam
Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.
-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.
-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.
-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers
-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.
...
4. No Porn/Explicit
Content
-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.
-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.
...
5. No Enciting Harassment,
Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts
-Do not Brigade other Communities
-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.
-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.
-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.
...
6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.
...
If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.
Also check out:
Partnered Communities:
1.Memes
10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)
Reach out to
All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Not me. But I don't really have much money to spend or save anyways
the lashes are upside down π
That's where I saved money. Went to someone who had no experience
The funny thing is that as a woman I"m in the same situation but without the nails/lips/hair/eyelashes etc I spend all my money in crochet yarn and filament/resin for 3d print... besides the ocasional new hobby
As I got broke I learned to do those things at home.
Me: if I DIY I'll save money!
My 30 bottles of nail polish plus files and oils:
In a world that absolutely judges you based on your looks, is something that makes you look good really a "bad" investment?
This kind of shit could possibly make the difference between being hired at a job or not, as wild as that is to say.
This is also part of why many people were enamored with the idea of remote work and not needing to have a webcam. The idea that maybe, just maybe, they wouldn't be judged by their looks in a job interview but instead judged by their skills and abilities.
Further, when the majority of people cannot afford the basics (recent numbers put it at 68% of Americans are living paycheck to paycheck), is it really their fault they cannot save? What kind of society are we creating when we are effectively telling the lower classes that they deserve no kindness, no pampering, no self-fulfillment? "Fuck getting that coffee, you could buy a house if you didn't!" type bullshit that is totally untrue.
You 100% are judged on your looks. As someone who's assigned female though, and usually lets interviewers read them as such initially, I have something to add.
There's a VERY specific type of look women have to have in order to be seen as professional. You have to be as flawless as possible, but you also have to be understated. Any 'fun' type of femininity is looked down on. The long lashes, long nails and red lips definitely fall in that category. 'Professional' for women means you have to spend a lot of time and money on skin, makeup, jewelry, nails, hair, clothing, but you can't have fun with it.*
Personally I'm in stem academia, where it's expected that you look like you don't spend any time on your appearance at all. Otherwise it'll be assumed you can't keep up with the men. Still can't have, for example, body hair though.
*Unless you happen to have fun with nude colours and understated jewelry and fashion. Nothing wrong with that!
I would challenge the statement that half meter long nails and three liters of Botox and fillers in one face are far beyond the 'self fulfillment' and is rather a (very, very bad) marketing attempt.
If you decide to use your last money to stroke own ego and look like a porn star, that's on you.
Thanks for the "poor people shouldn't be allowed any luxuries" speech and proving my point.
Because clearly it's fine for the rich to do this, because they spend their money wisely, right? It's not a completely broken ass system that harms the poor for anything they buy to indulge themselves, right?
That's exactly not what I said but you do you
I don't think the point of their comment was "poor people shouldn't have luxuries". Stupid actions are stupid, regardless. But when a rich person buys a sports car it's just regular stupid, and when somebody spends their entire savings on a sports car and starves later, that's extra stupid, because priorities. Everybody is free to do whatever, but it's important to admit when we do something stupid.
Enjoy not having a job with your natural botox-free filler-free face and bitten-nails
So it's all about marketing your flesh bag to the highest bidder? Ah so ironic.
I mean, yeah? That's all job interviews are.
Even not considering the visuals - you're just marketing yourself as more valuable to the corpo than others vying for the same place, regardless of whether you're a man or woman.
But for women there's an extra barrier. Many men, especially on the older side literally do not believe a woman can actually be on-par with a man in your usual blue collar job, nevermind exceed one, they cannot be convinced as such no matter what.
These are the types of men to give you a lecture about how you're not given a voice, but then literally never let you get a word in. This behaviour is so deeply ingrained and internalised it's just not really changeable.
What you can do though is distract from whatever they think your value is by being "nice to look at". Their overall impression will be positive then when it comes to deciding these things at least.
This same strategy has a less commonly needed equivalent of men having a good shot at giving female interviewers a good impression by being charming and sociable.
Lookism is alive and well, always has been, probably always will be.
... I thought it was referring to manually saving in videogames.
Thank god. I thought I was the only dumbass in this thread.
That's what F5 is for.
No notes on this comment