607
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Wow that's unbelievable. As in I literally don't believe it. So I tested it by posting various sentences containing these words and other known slurs to compare, and found it didn't work.

Maybe this is some American thing I'm not Free enough to experience in my corner of the world, or it doesn't do this on android or the browser site. (The tech crunch screenshot looks like something else, probably iOS)

It hard to say because no one is even a little bit curious enough to test it. Idk how this thread contains anything else but people testing it, because it's so damn unbelievable. Why is no one testing this themselves? Why are you not testing it yourself?

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

I thought he was a "free speech absolutist"

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

For me but not for thee

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

I do not understand why people still use Twitter...

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I know right? People need to grow a back bone, I'm sure twitter used to be great, but if it's not for you anymore then move on and don't look back, there's plenty of other ways to spend your time.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I don't understand why anyone used twitter in the first place

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

All speech is free, but some speech is more free than others

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

This isn’t even new, the Boer cried about it already like months ago

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 May 2024
607 points (95.9% liked)

News

21578 readers
3461 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS