this post was submitted on 13 May 2024
531 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3950 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

We don't have a healthcare system in the US, we have an insurance racket.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

"Healthcare" implies it's something useful and available.

It is "luxury health". If you can't pay, you don't stay.

Wish they would just say that instead of all this other abstract nonsense like health-care.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

If you edit the URL to add the www you won't get the access denied

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago

I made about $3,000 more last year than the year before, so now I have a little under 30 days to use literally all the healthcare related things I can before I lose government insurance.

My yearly medical costs are higher than $3,000 but not enough to justify getting insurance.

So now I get to lose money because I made more money, Unlike all those fuckwads who blather on about how they're paying more in taxes now than their raise was...

[–] [email protected] 30 points 6 months ago (2 children)

As someone who has lived in Europe for many years, the healthcare system is one of my least favorite things about the US. Absolute trash. But many people keep voting for candidates who don't want change, so no change it is.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's weird because most hate it. I remember when Michael Moore's movie came out and even those in red states were gathering together to say that if we let this go on then we're complicit!

Then I think I remember Fox News and the right-wing going on a blitz. "Death Panels" and shit

https://youtu.be/JPa19PgTxZc?si=_M9f1k4noEEr0XJN

Look at this disinformation campaign. This is what pisses me off about this "both sides" bullshit. Also, whenever any comedian jerks themselves off about speaking the truth and being philosophers going off on woke when they shut their mouths about shit like this.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago

“Death Panels” and shit

That was honestly the part that pissed me off the most about that whole discourse, mainly because we already had death panels and they were regularly sentencing people to death in order to save money.

They were called insurance companies, and they were able to drop your coverage and sentence you to death because you can't afford to pay to stay alive.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 months ago (2 children)

But many people keep voting for candidates who don’t want change, so no change it is.

Candidates who want change are rare.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Most Democrats I know want a different healthcare system, including myself. I always find a candidate to vote for who want the same.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Most Democrats I know want a different healthcare system, including myself.

Most Democrats I know aren't candidates.

I always find a candidate to vote for who want the same.

It's easy to find a Democratic candidate who says they want change.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It takes 60 votes in the Senate for real reform. The Democrats never have 60 votes, so it's incremental change. It's a marathon, not a sprint.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It takes 60 votes in the Senate for real reform.

Because Democrats won't end the filibuster.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The end of the filibuster for Democrats means the end of the filibuster for Republicans...think about it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

We're so scared of what Republicans might do that we let Roe die.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Roe died at the hands of the Supreme Court and Trump based on what happened during a Republican majority. Justice approval only requires a simple Senate majority. Filibuster or no filibuster. Result would have been the same.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

Could have expanded the courts except for the filibuster.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 months ago (1 children)

And when someone does come along, the obstructionist party torpedoes it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Truman's fair deal, yeah

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

TFW they have to find one person to state this for the headline.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Russia has universal healthcare. Russia. Wtf America? Why aren't you on the streets demanding it as hard as you demand things for people in other countries?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Because if we're in the streets, we aren't working. Which means we die because there's zero social safety net.

load more comments
view more: next ›