this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2024
686 points (99.3% liked)

Political Memes

5426 readers
2294 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
686
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

It only exists when observed by the right people.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago

Schroedingers President.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Is he really claiming that? I thought your constitution would have something to stop that? The magna carta set out that a king wasn't above the law 800 years ago.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Laws are for chumps, not for Trumps. Or so the ex-President is officially arguing. “A president has to have immunity, otherwise you just have a ceremonial president.”

[–] [email protected] 40 points 6 months ago

I like "You can't impeach the President without them first having been charged with a crime!" next to "You have to impeach and convict the president before you can charge them with a crime!".

These two incompatible legal arguments were both used by Trump's lawyers at one point.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The most pathetic example of homo sapiens alive today

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

I misread this as "athletic" and thought, you were quoting him.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

"only in these circumstances"

Wasn't that close to the wording in the Gore V Bush case

these justice are too corrupt to be trusted. Could more justices be added?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

Could and should. We should have 13 justices at the point (13 circuit courts)

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago

I hope he gets full immunity and proves POTUS can do whatever they want and then Biden publicly executes Trump. That shit would be fucking hilarious.

[–] [email protected] 88 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Ah, but if a president can do whatever they want without being held legally responsible, then they can punish someone regardless of whether or not they're legally responsible for what they did.

That comes with a fun loophole - if the courts decide that presidents are immune to all legal repercussions, then Biden can just illegally arrest Trump and throw him in prison for no reason, and suffer no legal repercussions for it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I don't think Biden takes Trump as seriously as he says he does.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago

He fucking better

[–] [email protected] 49 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Amongst the greatest of ridiculous things a president could ask for. The generation that had to experience Nixon is supporting this joke.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Not all of us

[–] [email protected] 52 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Nixon still had Congressional support until shortly before articles of impeachment were sent to the House floor (late July 1974, and never voted on) which was 3 years after the Pentagon Papers were first published (June 1971). He was only forced to resign AFTER the media started covering the scandal and what it actually meant in depth and Congress was having to actually start answering questions from constituents.

History.com has a decent timeline of the major events to reference.

There's a reason propaganda-based "news" organizations like Fox News were created after Nixon, and regulations like the Fairness Doctrine were removed under Reagan. It was so they could control the media commentary and insert their own propaganda under the guise of impartial "news" services.

Organizations prior obviously had biases, but national news organizations were generally pretty balanced, nothing like many modern day organizations despite their clear lies about being balanced.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 months ago

They have been laying the groundwork for this for decades, and now they are ready to collect.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Ask not what the president can do, ask what the president did to me.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Show us on this diorama of the Capital where the president tried to insurrect you

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

“you’re just pointing to the all of it?”