this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2024
604 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

69421 readers
2864 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

while i'm obviously sure it's a bluff, pulling out instead of selling would be the clearest admittance that tiktok is (or at that point: was) not about the profit, but about Chinese influence in the US. the message being "we rather leave a hudred billion dollars on the table than give away our surveillance technology to some US company."

but yeah, they will def. sell if they need to.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

It's more like their US profits are no match for their Chinese profits. Social media use in China and other Asian countries dwarfs US use.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

There are valid commercial reasons not to go through a forced sale with a ticking time limit, which will inevitably carry a steeply discounted price. Rather than getting robbed, it makes sense to hang on to the company and take profits from the rest of the world.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago

Could they please pull from Europe, too?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Okay bye Felicia

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Good 1 less spyware app

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I think this is a good move honestly, they want it to be an algo similar to meta which you know is terrible, meta is like mostly dudes saying gen Z men are AWAKE and hate LGBT people and tate clips. They seem to have much less success in the algorithm on tiktok

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If the Chinese government is behind this, it's a great play. Having Joe Biden be "the guy who banned tik tok" would severely undermine his election chances.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why would China want Biden to lose?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

Because Trump is equivalent to self destruction.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

They were 14 four years ago

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Guess we'll find out whether TikTok or reproductive freedom is more important...

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

14 year olds aren't the only people who use Tik Tok

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

Lemmy really seems to generally think that TikTok isn't massively overall popular. Lemmy would have someone thinking it's a niche app only being used by teenagers.

load more comments
view more: next ›