this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2024
270 points (96.6% liked)

politics

19088 readers
3664 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Other coverage for comparison:

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 31 points 6 months ago (1 children)

At least we know the origin of fake news, it's the orange man himself.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago

Always was.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 months ago

But it's him so the rules don't apply.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 6 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Two possibilities:

  • The judge finds him guilty of contempt and orders a short jail term as punishment. Could happen any time now that he's heard arguments, but the prosecution didn't request it, so a $1000 fine is much more likely unless he keeps on violating the gag order.
  • The jury convicts him, and he's then sentenced to a significant term. This won't happen until the trial is over, several weeks hence
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

They should just gag him during trial and only take it out if he needs to answer. Then sell the drawings to the highest bidder.

Maybe gag him out of court as well, and take his phones and computers. And spank him a little.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Reality number 1: He avoids all responsibility. Avoids all punishment.

He has so far had a 100% success rate in avoiding jail time or any consequences. I hate the guy and wish that hell was real (I'll even go there too if it meant these kinds of people would) but I would never in a billion years bet against him avoiding punishment.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm not saying you're wrong, but this is the case for everyone before they go to jail.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I don't think anyone has as long a track record of committing obvious jailable offenses and staying out of jail though. At least not that we have record of

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The first step is to get charged, the second is to be convicted. There are plenty in Trump's shoes, who have only been criminally co evicted once and got a slap on the wrist. The smart ones pull the correct strings and don't even get charged, and certainly don't have their misdeeds reported in the media if they can help it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

My original point, that he won't spend a second in jail or ever be punished for any of his crimes still stands..

With the way he's organized his fundraising and his Trump Co stuff. He stands to make billions by losing the election. Winning will just make him emperor.

He will die fat and rich and orange in Florida ranting on truth social while taking a shit and snorting Adderall

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

That's certainly possible, and I'm not very optimistic that he will see jail.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Things are getting spicy again. Pecker knows Karen McDougal.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

Another hushed Playboy Playmate, for those who don't know.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I was curious about a specific term:

"In a pivotal stretch of testimony, David Pecker, the longtime publisher of The National Enquirer, described a 2015 meeting with Mr. Trump and his fixer at the time, Michael D. Cohen, at Mr. Trump’s midtown Manhattan headquarters.

Fixer
Noun
2. A person who uses influence or makes arrangements for another, especially by improper or unlawful means.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This is a bit circular as an explanation, but that’s actually what Cohen did for Trump.

Trump has referred to Cohen as a lawyer that helped him deal with things, and Cohen has fully admitted that he acted as a traditional fixer for Trump for years.

So.. yeah. The definition is spot on.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

My point being that one doesn't need a fixer, unless one does illegal things. Can we not have criminals in places of power? Soonish?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Oh. Yup.
Your point in the first comment flew right over my head, but I agree fully.

load more comments
view more: next ›