this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2024
264 points (95.5% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6620 readers
103 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Knife > automatic Weapon 🥸

(page 2) 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago

I just want to shoot a belt fed in peace man

[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago (2 children)

"Why is it effective at Suppression?"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Help, help, I'm bein suppressed!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 79 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Civilians should only be able to buy hand grenades for self defence, as they are very inaccurate, and everybody having them guarantees MAD. Peace achieved

[–] [email protected] 20 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (31 children)

Tbf, it's legal federally in the US. You just have tobpay the $200 tax stamp and wait for ATF approval for each one

[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

~~What? That's not true at all. Grenades are classified as "destructive devices" under the National Firearms Act, and illegal for civilians to own.~~

After looking up a different source, I guess I was wrong. You have to pass some enhanced background checks, submit your fingerprints, and pay $200

load more comments (30 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Like a string of black cats going off.

[–] [email protected] 94 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It's because having a gun out slows you down. Everybody knows you run faster when your knife is out

[–] [email protected] 37 points 7 months ago

What we really need is to give everyone fully-automatic knives to prevent this sort of thing from happening.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 7 months ago (2 children)

He's still going on, arguing that a shooting would've caused less casualties

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The "Tell me your only exposure to automatic weapons is Call of Duty" comment got a good chortle out of me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Would my full automatic knife do more or less damage according to him?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 7 months ago

"Sstabie Stab Riealy Fist"

[–] [email protected] 22 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's the rat penis all over again, isn't it?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

OK, I'm out of the loop on that one, and the curiosity is just too much for me...got a link?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

OK, that rat has much bigger problems than just the penis.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago

but does he tramioncatiie his zжpens?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

Damn that sum bich got 4 testtomcels

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago

You should ask him, at the moment he's arguing that being shot is perfectly safe, actually

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 7 months ago (2 children)

The Guy with the knife was in Australia

[–] [email protected] 32 points 7 months ago (3 children)

The commenter was almost certainly a Yankee Doofus though.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

it's the birth of new pierre sprey

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Honestly, I'd say they're even worse.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

i think that reformism and .45 boomerism come from the same strain of thought. yeah no shit recoil is hard to control with full power cartridge (like AR-10 in .308 that he has), that's why intermediate cartridge was developed. this gets worse in handguns

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

i'm like 90% sure he's american and sold guns in the past

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Civilians owning automatic guns is not really a thing here

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

Oh yeah? You don't say.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago

Maybe the weapon apologist is from America

[–] [email protected] 20 points 7 months ago (5 children)

(Hello first Post here, if this one is too low-effort I will remove it and apologize.)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

just the right amount of effort. you're ok, just don't forget to bring Kensington Breakfast for everybody next time.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago

All good, and thanks for censoring the names

[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago

While the post doesn't have oversexualised f35, it's still within NCD spirit I think

[–] [email protected] 24 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You don't have to remove it, but I want an apology video with a cute pet on camera please

[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago

Can't I lust link one of Logan Pauls?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›