this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2025
71 points (85.9% liked)

Showerthoughts

35459 readers
2360 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 16 hours ago

Hence divide and conquer.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 17 hours ago

And even more people under the same social class should band together that would have a much bigger majority

[–] [email protected] 3 points 18 hours ago

My hyper coalition an-cap-com people's democratic uniparty dictatorship will save the west.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 18 hours ago

Main problem: agreeing on a banner design. Also a fair amount of hating each other.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 18 hours ago

That's not how that works.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I wish I could have the courage to collect downvotes like you

And in your own thread!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago

Thank you for caring about a metric that doesn't matter for me. Do you worry about everyone's down votes or just the pretty ones like me?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)

This assumes the minority groups can all agree on things in order to “come together.”

[–] [email protected] 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

They're deliberately being divided.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Everyone is being deliberately divided. It’s not specific to minority groups. I guess my issue is that the post is vague and assumes minority groups act as voting blocs which is pretty simplistic. OP is basically saying what everyone already knows: that there are more people making up “minorities” than there are making up the “majority.” I would argue that your local community has a higher impact on your vote than your ethnicity or race. For sure, those play a part, but they don’t singularly define your vote. Also, various minority groups skew quite differently. Latinos typically skew more conservative than, say Jews or blacks.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

This assumes the minority groups can all agree on things in order to “come together.”

Do you know what a moot point is?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I suspect you've never hung out with enough different minority groups to understand the scope of difficulty. I mean FFS the Latinos vote against immigration, The poor vote against social services. Even when you run into a minority group that is doing things in their best interest, they're not inclined to stick their neck out for people outside there subgroup. Nobody else is taking care of them so they take care of themselves and they give no F's about the other minorities

The concept that all the minorities together aren't a minority anymore is true at some level, I think you've got a better chance of having white leftists stand up for them then them standing up for each other.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I suspect you’ve never hung out with enough different minority groups to understand the scope of difficulty. I mean FFS the Latinos vote against immigration, The poor vote against social services. Even when you run into a minority group that is doing things in their best interest, they’re not inclined to stick their neck out for people outside there subgroup. Nobody else is taking care of them so they take care of themselves and they give no F’s about the other minorities

You should reflect on why your rhetoric and beliefs are a major part of the problem.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Your inexperience and own beliefs do not make the experiences of those talking to you invalid; furthermore, calling other people's experiences rhetoric and belief is frankly rude.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

Your inexperience and own beliefs do not make the experiences of those talking to you invalid; furthermore, calling other people’s experiences rhetoric and belief is frankly rude.

Saying "the latinos vote against immigration", "the poor vote against social services", and assuming all groups are out for themselves is bigotry.

Your constant personal attacks and bad faith arguing is what is rude, and assuming I have never "hung out with enough minorities to think right" is another huge helping of bigotry from you.

That said, I'm out.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I do, and my point wasn’t. Not all minority groups agree on everything just because they’re minorities. The world is a tad more complicated than that. Besides, what are they “coming together” to do? Overthrow the “majority?” Does that automatically assume that the majority is wrong and minorities are right just because they’re minorities? Again, the world’s just not that simple.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 22 hours ago

This was about rights, not agreeing on every single subject. For minority groups without, or lacking in, basic human rights in the same population it is more productive to try and attain them as a singular group.

Everything you have said is a moot point in regards to what I am saying.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The oppressive class usually isn't a majority (capital owners/rich, religious fanatics, morning people), but they dictate so much more of our lives, what to feel, who to hate - so much so that they make the majority work for them against the minorities (that don't affect the lives of the majority in the slightest - but that's just how the oppressors retain control & power).

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This doesn't really change, or add, to my point does it?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Change no, but it was my humble intention to add a little bit.
Understanding things/humans & why we behave bad is important imho.

Basically banning minorities together is in a lot of ways how the majority is made. And those never behave in the interest of most.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's what intersectionality is about, and why fascists focus on driving wedges between groups

load more comments
view more: next ›