this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2025
82 points (87.3% liked)

Showerthoughts

35459 readers
1539 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

This assumes the minority groups can all agree on things in order to “come together.”

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They're deliberately being divided.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Everyone is being deliberately divided. It’s not specific to minority groups. I guess my issue is that the post is vague and assumes minority groups act as voting blocs which is pretty simplistic. OP is basically saying what everyone already knows: that there are more people making up “minorities” than there are making up the “majority.” I would argue that your local community has a higher impact on your vote than your ethnicity or race. For sure, those play a part, but they don’t singularly define your vote. Also, various minority groups skew quite differently. Latinos typically skew more conservative than, say Jews or blacks.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This assumes the minority groups can all agree on things in order to “come together.”

Do you know what a moot point is?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I suspect you've never hung out with enough different minority groups to understand the scope of difficulty. I mean FFS the Latinos vote against immigration, The poor vote against social services. Even when you run into a minority group that is doing things in their best interest, they're not inclined to stick their neck out for people outside there subgroup. Nobody else is taking care of them so they take care of themselves and they give no F's about the other minorities

The concept that all the minorities together aren't a minority anymore is true at some level, I think you've got a better chance of having white leftists stand up for them then them standing up for each other.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I suspect you’ve never hung out with enough different minority groups to understand the scope of difficulty. I mean FFS the Latinos vote against immigration, The poor vote against social services. Even when you run into a minority group that is doing things in their best interest, they’re not inclined to stick their neck out for people outside there subgroup. Nobody else is taking care of them so they take care of themselves and they give no F’s about the other minorities

You should reflect on why your rhetoric and beliefs are a major part of the problem.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Your inexperience and own beliefs do not make the experiences of those talking to you invalid; furthermore, calling other people's experiences rhetoric and belief is frankly rude.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 16 hours ago

Your inexperience and own beliefs do not make the experiences of those talking to you invalid; furthermore, calling other people’s experiences rhetoric and belief is frankly rude.

Saying "the latinos vote against immigration", "the poor vote against social services", and assuming all groups are out for themselves is bigotry.

Your constant personal attacks and bad faith arguing is what is rude, and assuming I have never "hung out with enough minorities to think right" is another huge helping of bigotry from you.

That said, I'm out.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I do, and my point wasn’t. Not all minority groups agree on everything just because they’re minorities. The world is a tad more complicated than that. Besides, what are they “coming together” to do? Overthrow the “majority?” Does that automatically assume that the majority is wrong and minorities are right just because they’re minorities? Again, the world’s just not that simple.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 day ago

This was about rights, not agreeing on every single subject. For minority groups without, or lacking in, basic human rights in the same population it is more productive to try and attain them as a singular group.

Everything you have said is a moot point in regards to what I am saying.